RGSG
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
SIUDF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
May 28 closing price
Ad is loading...

RGSG vs SIUDF

Header iconRGSG vs SIUDF Comparison
Open Charts RGSG vs SIUDFBanner chart's image
Resources Global Services Group
Price$0.02
Change-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Volume$20K
CapitalizationN/A
Shanghai Industrial Urban Development Group
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$800
CapitalizationN/A
RGSG vs SIUDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
RGSG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RGSG vs. SIUDF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSG is a Hold and SIUDF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (RGSG: $0.02 vs. SIUDF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: RGSG and SIUDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RGSG: 174% vs. SIUDF: 100%
Market capitalization -- RGSG: $27.1K vs. SIUDF: $276.43M
RGSG [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $27.1K. SIUDF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $276.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RGSG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSIUDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RGSG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SIUDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SIUDF is a better buy in the long-term than RGSG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RGSG’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RGSG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

RGSG (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SIUDF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -3.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.84%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-3.02% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SIUDF($276M) has a higher market cap than RGSG($27.1K). SIUDF YTD gains are higher at: 33.600 vs. RGSG (-55.600). SIUDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.52B vs. RGSG (-142.25K). SIUDF has more cash in the bank: 8.81B vs. RGSG (925K). RGSG has less debt than SIUDF: RGSG (14M) vs SIUDF (20.3B). SIUDF has higher revenues than RGSG: SIUDF (13.2B) vs RGSG (6.42M).
RGSGSIUDFRGSG / SIUDF
Capitalization27.1K276M0%
EBITDA-142.25K3.52B-0%
Gain YTD-55.60033.600-165%
P/E RatioN/A5.33-
Revenue6.42M13.2B0%
Total Cash925K8.81B0%
Total Debt14M20.3B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RGSG: Fundamental Ratings
RGSG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
37
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
82
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RGSGSIUDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
9%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
9%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RGSG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HRIOX12.21N/A
N/A
Hood River International Opp Instl
PRVIX54.73-0.74
-1.33%
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value I
MENIX9.61-0.16
-1.64%
Madison Covered Call & Equity Income I
TAVZX57.04-1.27
-2.18%
Third Avenue Value Z
FMPTX31.77-1.12
-3.41%
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value M

RGSG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGSG has been loosely correlated with AYAAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RGSG jumps, then AYAAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGSG
1D Price
Change %
RGSG100%
N/A
AYAAF - RGSG
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SIUDF - RGSG
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHVKY - RGSG
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSPSF - RGSG
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUHJF - RGSG
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
More

SIUDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SIUDF and ABCP have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SIUDF and ABCP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIUDF
1D Price
Change %
SIUDF100%
N/A
ABCP - SIUDF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.64%
RGSG - SIUDF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRRE - SIUDF
19%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSPSF - SIUDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RBLAY - SIUDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More