Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGVBX vs RMAGX
RGVBX vs RMAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGVBX vs. RMAGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGVBX is a Hold and RMAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVBX has more cash in the bank: 23.8B vs. RMAGX (12.2B). RMAGX pays higher dividends than RGVBX: RMAGX (4.62) vs RGVBX (3.32). RGVBX was incepted earlier than RMAGX: RGVBX (23 years) vs RMAGX (15 years). RGVBX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RMAGX (0.31). RMAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 824.00 vs. RGVBX (50.00). RGVBX (250) and RMAGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.85 vs. RGVBX (6.16). RMAGX return over 5 years is better than : -1.10 vs. RGVBX (-9.35).
| RGVBX | RMAGX | RGVBX / RMAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.26 | 512% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.31 | 442% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.178 | 7.733 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.8B | 12.2B | 195% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.32 | 4.62 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.16 | 7.85 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.04 | 14.11 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.35 | -1.10 | 851% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.39 | 12.84 | -3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers