Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGVCX vs RMAGX
RGVCX vs RMAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGVCX vs. RMAGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGVCX is a Hold and RMAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVCX has more cash in the bank: 23.8B vs. RMAGX (12.2B). RMAGX pays higher dividends than RGVCX: RMAGX (4.62) vs RGVCX (3.74). RGVCX was incepted earlier than RMAGX: RGVCX (23 years) vs RMAGX (15 years). RGVCX (0.93) is less costly to investors than RMAGX (0.31). RMAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 824.00 vs. RGVCX (50.00). RGVCX (250) and RMAGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.85 vs. RGVCX (6.60). RMAGX return over 5 years is better than : -1.10 vs. RGVCX (-7.36).
| RGVCX | RMAGX | RGVCX / RMAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.26 | 342% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.31 | 300% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.538 | 7.733 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.8B | 12.2B | 195% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.74 | 4.62 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.60 | 7.85 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.37 | 14.11 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.36 | -1.10 | 669% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.95 | 12.84 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers