RH
Price
$200.76
Change
-$4.86 (-2.36%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
6.38B
33 days until earnings call
TBHC
Price
$1.23
Change
-$0.14 (-10.22%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
31.15M
33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

RH vs TBHC

Header iconRH vs TBHC Comparison
Open Charts RH vs TBHCBanner chart's image
RH
Price$200.76
Change-$4.86 (-2.36%)
Volume$1.32M
Capitalization6.38B
THE BRAND HOUSE COLLECTIVE
Price$1.23
Change-$0.14 (-10.22%)
Volume$262.58K
Capitalization31.15M
RH vs TBHC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TBHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RH vs. TBHC commentary
Aug 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RH is a Hold and TBHC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 02, 2025
Stock price -- (RH: $200.76 vs. TBHC: $1.23)
Brand notoriety: RH: Notable vs. TBHC: Not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RH: 98% vs. TBHC: 64%
Market capitalization -- RH: $6.38B vs. TBHC: $31.15M
RH [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $6.38B. TBHC’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $31.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTBHC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TBHC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both RH and TBHC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TBHC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TBHC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TBHC is a better buy in the short-term than RH.

Price Growth

RH (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -6.10% price change this week, while TBHC (@Specialty Stores) price change was -17.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -6.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

RH is expected to report earnings on Sep 04, 2025.

TBHC is expected to report earnings on Sep 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-6.30% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RH($6.38B) has a higher market cap than TBHC($31.1M). RH has higher P/E ratio than TBHC: RH (56.64) vs TBHC (4.79). TBHC YTD gains are higher at: -24.074 vs. RH (-48.993). RH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 524M vs. TBHC (-23.85M). RH has more cash in the bank: 124M vs. TBHC (4.89M). TBHC has less debt than RH: TBHC (198M) vs RH (3.72B). RH has higher revenues than TBHC: RH (3.03B) vs TBHC (480M).
RHTBHCRH / TBHC
Capitalization6.38B31.1M20,511%
EBITDA524M-23.85M-2,197%
Gain YTD-48.993-24.074204%
P/E Ratio56.644.791,182%
Revenue3.03B480M631%
Total Cash124M4.89M2,536%
Total Debt3.72B198M1,877%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RH vs TBHC: Fundamental Ratings
RH
TBHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8484
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
33100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6347
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8597
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TBHC's Valuation (52) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RH (74). This means that TBHC’s stock grew similarly to RH’s over the last 12 months.

TBHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RH (100). This means that TBHC’s stock grew similarly to RH’s over the last 12 months.

RH's SMR Rating (33) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for TBHC (100). This means that RH’s stock grew significantly faster than TBHC’s over the last 12 months.

TBHC's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RH (63). This means that TBHC’s stock grew similarly to RH’s over the last 12 months.

RH's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as TBHC (97). This means that RH’s stock grew similarly to TBHC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RHTBHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TBHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACT35.130.37
+1.08%
Enact Holdings
FCX40.03-0.21
-0.52%
Freeport-McMoran
ARKR8.35-0.25
-2.91%
Ark Restaurants Corp
NGS23.29-0.89
-3.68%
Natural Gas Services Group
ZIP3.96-0.24
-5.71%
ZipRecruiter

TBHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TBHC has been loosely correlated with FLWS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TBHC jumps, then FLWS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TBHC
1D Price
Change %
TBHC100%
-10.22%
FLWS - TBHC
41%
Loosely correlated
-8.97%
RH - TBHC
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.36%
HZO - TBHC
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
HNST - TBHC
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.82%
LE - TBHC
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.71%
More