RH
Price
$157.37
Change
-$14.71 (-8.55%)
Updated
Apr 11, 11:42 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.38B
55 days until earnings call
TKLF
Price
$3.25
Change
+$0.21 (+6.91%)
Updated
Apr 11, 12:52 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.56M
Ad is loading...

RH vs TKLF

Header iconRH vs TKLF Comparison
Open Charts RH vs TKLFBanner chart's image
RH
Price$157.37
Change-$14.71 (-8.55%)
Volume$900
Capitalization6.38B
Tokyo Lifestyle
Price$3.25
Change+$0.21 (+6.91%)
Volume$584
Capitalization10.56M
RH vs TKLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
RH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RH vs. TKLF commentary
Apr 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RH is a Hold and TKLF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 11, 2025
Stock price -- (RH: $172.08 vs. TKLF: $3.04)
Brand notoriety: RH: Notable vs. TKLF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RH: 214% vs. TKLF: 8%
Market capitalization -- RH: $6.38B vs. TKLF: $10.56M
RH [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $6.38B. TKLF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $10.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTKLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TKLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TKLF is a better buy in the long-term than RH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

RH (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +15.19% price change this week, while TKLF (@Specialty Stores) price change was -4.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

RH is expected to report earnings on Jun 05, 2025.

TKLF is expected to report earnings on Mar 24, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-0.41% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RH($6.38B) has a higher market cap than TKLF($10.6M). TKLF YTD gains are higher at: -8.157 vs. RH (-56.279).
RHTKLFRH / TKLF
Capitalization6.38B10.6M60,179%
EBITDA524MN/A-
Gain YTD-56.279-8.157690%
P/E Ratio56.64N/A-
Revenue3.03BN/A-
Total Cash124MN/A-
Total Debt3.72BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RH: Fundamental Ratings
RH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
78
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83
SMR RATING
1..100
32
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
91
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
32
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CCO1.02-0.02
-1.92%
Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings
L84.37-1.96
-2.27%
Loews Corp
LCII77.54-4.17
-5.10%
LCI Industries
STHO6.41-0.42
-6.15%
Star Holdings
BTAI1.64-0.15
-8.38%
BioXcel Therapeutics

TKLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TKLF and NAAS have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TKLF and NAAS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TKLF
1D Price
Change %
TKLF100%
+6.18%
NAAS - TKLF
33%
Poorly correlated
-6.65%
SBH - TKLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
WINA - TKLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.28%
BGFV - TKLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.50%
RUSHA - TKLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.29%
More