RHHBF
Price
$380.00
Change
-$6.00 (-1.55%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
Capitalization
293.71B
SNPHY
Price
$10.33
Change
-$0.49 (-4.53%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
Capitalization
3.44B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RHHBF vs SNPHY

Header iconRHHBF vs SNPHY Comparison
Open Charts RHHBF vs SNPHYBanner chart's image
Roche Holding
Price$380.00
Change-$6.00 (-1.55%)
Volume$771
Capitalization293.71B
Santen Pharmaceutical
Price$10.33
Change-$0.49 (-4.53%)
Volume$155.01K
Capitalization3.44B
RHHBF vs SNPHY Comparison Chart in %
RHHBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNPHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RHHBF vs. SNPHY commentary
Oct 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RHHBF is a Buy and SNPHY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 10, 2025
Stock price -- (RHHBF: $383.00 vs. SNPHY: $10.39)
Brand notoriety: RHHBF and SNPHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Major industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RHHBF: 128% vs. SNPHY: 109%
Market capitalization -- RHHBF: $294.63B vs. SNPHY: $3.37B
RHHBF [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] is valued at $294.63B. SNPHY’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] market capitalization is $3.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry ranges from $758.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry is $96.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RHHBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSNPHY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RHHBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SNPHY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RHHBF is a better buy in the long-term than SNPHY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RHHBF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNPHY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RHHBF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SNPHY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RHHBF is a better buy in the short-term than SNPHY.

Price Growth

RHHBF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а +1.52% price change this week, while SNPHY (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was -11.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was +0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Major (+0.79% weekly)

The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHHBF($294B) has a higher market cap than SNPHY($3.44B). RHHBF has higher P/E ratio than SNPHY: RHHBF (25.73) vs SNPHY (14.99). RHHBF YTD gains are higher at: 26.170 vs. SNPHY (2.115). SNPHY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 51.1B vs. RHHBF (18B). SNPHY has more cash in the bank: 85.9B vs. RHHBF (12B). SNPHY has higher revenues than RHHBF: SNPHY (303B) vs RHHBF (63.5B).
RHHBFSNPHYRHHBF / SNPHY
Capitalization294B3.44B8,547%
EBITDA18B51.1B35%
Gain YTD26.1702.1151,238%
P/E Ratio25.7314.99172%
Revenue63.5B303B21%
Total Cash12B85.9B14%
Total Debt33BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RHHBF vs SNPHY: Fundamental Ratings
RHHBF
SNPHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
273
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
85100
SMR RATING
1..100
9999
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4658
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3290
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RHHBF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as SNPHY (32). This means that RHHBF’s stock grew similarly to SNPHY’s over the last 12 months.

RHHBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as SNPHY (100). This means that RHHBF’s stock grew similarly to SNPHY’s over the last 12 months.

RHHBF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as SNPHY (99). This means that RHHBF’s stock grew similarly to SNPHY’s over the last 12 months.

RHHBF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as SNPHY (58). This means that RHHBF’s stock grew similarly to SNPHY’s over the last 12 months.

RHHBF's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNPHY (90). This means that RHHBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNPHY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RHHBFSNPHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RHHBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNPHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MFOCX33.13N/A
N/A
Marsico Focus
LBSCX35.38N/A
N/A
Columbia Dividend Income C
RGWCX25.75N/A
N/A
Victory RS Growth C
FWIFX39.51N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide I
CBSLX28.01N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders R

RHHBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RHHBF and RHHBY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RHHBF and RHHBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RHHBF
1D Price
Change %
RHHBF100%
-1.55%
RHHBY - RHHBF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
RHHVF - RHHBF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
NVS - RHHBF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
JNJ - RHHBF
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
ABBV - RHHBF
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
More

SNPHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SNPHY and RHHBF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNPHY and RHHBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNPHY
1D Price
Change %
SNPHY100%
-4.49%
RHHBF - SNPHY
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.55%
RHHVF - SNPHY
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
RHHBY - SNPHY
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
OTSKY - SNPHY
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.12%
SNPHF - SNPHY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More