RHHBF
Price
$347.36
Change
+$12.06 (+3.60%)
Updated
Sep 16 closing price
Capitalization
266.6B
SNPHY
Price
$10.95
Change
-$0.32 (-2.84%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.69B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RHHBF vs SNPHY

Header iconRHHBF vs SNPHY Comparison
Open Charts RHHBF vs SNPHYBanner chart's image
Roche Holding
Price$347.36
Change+$12.06 (+3.60%)
Volume$21
Capitalization266.6B
Santen Pharmaceutical
Price$10.95
Change-$0.32 (-2.84%)
Volume$13.52K
Capitalization3.69B
RHHBF vs SNPHY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RHHBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNPHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RHHBF vs. SNPHY commentary
Sep 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RHHBF is a Buy and SNPHY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 19, 2025
Stock price -- (RHHBF: $345.72 vs. SNPHY: $10.90)
Brand notoriety: RHHBF and SNPHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Major industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RHHBF: 149% vs. SNPHY: 14%
Market capitalization -- RHHBF: $266.6B vs. SNPHY: $3.69B
RHHBF [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] is valued at $266.6B. SNPHY’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] market capitalization is $3.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry ranges from $683.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry is $88.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RHHBF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNPHY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RHHBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SNPHY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RHHBF is a better buy in the long-term than SNPHY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RHHBF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNPHY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RHHBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SNPHY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both RHHBF and SNPHY are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

RHHBF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а -2.09% price change this week, while SNPHY (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was -3.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was -1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.28%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Major (-1.23% weekly)

The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHHBF($267B) has a higher market cap than SNPHY($3.69B). RHHBF has higher P/E ratio than SNPHY: RHHBF (23.15) vs SNPHY (15.39). RHHBF YTD gains are higher at: 14.788 vs. SNPHY (7.708). SNPHY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 51.1B vs. RHHBF (18B). SNPHY has more cash in the bank: 85.9B vs. RHHBF (12B). SNPHY has higher revenues than RHHBF: SNPHY (303B) vs RHHBF (63.5B).
RHHBFSNPHYRHHBF / SNPHY
Capitalization267B3.69B7,232%
EBITDA18B51.1B35%
Gain YTD14.7887.708192%
P/E Ratio23.1515.39150%
Revenue63.5B303B21%
Total Cash12B85.9B14%
Total Debt33BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RHHBF vs SNPHY: Fundamental Ratings
RHHBF
SNPHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3087
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
99100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5354
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3886
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a24

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RHHBF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as SNPHY (33). This means that RHHBF’s stock grew similarly to SNPHY’s over the last 12 months.

RHHBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SNPHY (100). This means that RHHBF’s stock grew similarly to SNPHY’s over the last 12 months.

RHHBF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as SNPHY (100). This means that RHHBF’s stock grew similarly to SNPHY’s over the last 12 months.

RHHBF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as SNPHY (54). This means that RHHBF’s stock grew similarly to SNPHY’s over the last 12 months.

RHHBF's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNPHY (86). This means that RHHBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNPHY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RHHBFSNPHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RHHBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNPHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OYRDX29.34N/A
N/A
Invesco Rising Dividends Y
AGIFX21.05N/A
N/A
Alger Responsible Investing I
BCBDX13.18N/A
N/A
BlackRock Global Dividend Inv C
CDDYX37.34N/A
N/A
Columbia Dividend Income Inst3
MNOZX37.06N/A
N/A
Manning & Napier Overseas Series Z

RHHBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RHHBF and RHHBY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RHHBF and RHHBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RHHBF
1D Price
Change %
RHHBF100%
-0.47%
RHHBY - RHHBF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
RHHVF - RHHBF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.69%
NVS - RHHBF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
JNJ - RHHBF
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
ABBV - RHHBF
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
More

SNPHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SNPHY and RHHBF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNPHY and RHHBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNPHY
1D Price
Change %
SNPHY100%
-0.47%
RHHBF - SNPHY
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
RHHVF - SNPHY
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.69%
RHHBY - SNPHY
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
OTSKY - SNPHY
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
SNPHF - SNPHY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More