RKMSF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
9.85M
SIERF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.02 (-40.00%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
2.94M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RKMSF vs SIERF

Header iconRKMSF vs SIERF Comparison
Open Charts RKMSF vs SIERFBanner chart's image
Rokmaster Resources
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$5.88K
Capitalization9.85M
Sierra Grande Minerals
Price$0.03
Change-$0.02 (-40.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization2.94M
RKMSF vs SIERF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RKMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SIERF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RKMSF vs. SIERF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RKMSF is a Hold and SIERF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (RKMSF: $0.03 vs. SIERF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: RKMSF and SIERF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RKMSF: 33% vs. SIERF: 25%
Market capitalization -- RKMSF: $9.85M vs. SIERF: $2.94M
RKMSF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $9.85M. SIERF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RKMSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSIERF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RKMSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SIERF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RKMSF is a better buy in the long-term than SIERF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RKMSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SIERF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RKMSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SIERF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both RKMSF and SIERF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

RKMSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -21.76% price change this week, while SIERF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RKMSF($9.85M) has a higher market cap than SIERF($2.94M). RKMSF YTD gains are higher at: 100.925 vs. SIERF (-6.907). SIERF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -791.89K vs. RKMSF (-5.73M). SIERF has more cash in the bank: 389K vs. RKMSF (357K). RKMSF has less debt than SIERF: RKMSF (212K) vs SIERF (513K). RKMSF (0) and SIERF (0) have equivalent revenues.
RKMSFSIERFRKMSF / SIERF
Capitalization9.85M2.94M335%
EBITDA-5.73M-791.89K723%
Gain YTD100.925-6.907-1,461%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash357K389K92%
Total Debt212K513K41%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RKMSF vs SIERF: Fundamental Ratings
RKMSF
SIERF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9197
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10088
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3596
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10091
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RKMSF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is in the same range as SIERF (52). This means that RKMSF’s stock grew similarly to SIERF’s over the last 12 months.

RKMSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SIERF (100). This means that RKMSF’s stock grew similarly to SIERF’s over the last 12 months.

SIERF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as RKMSF (100). This means that SIERF’s stock grew similarly to RKMSF’s over the last 12 months.

RKMSF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SIERF (96). This means that RKMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SIERF’s over the last 12 months.

SIERF's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as RKMSF (100). This means that SIERF’s stock grew similarly to RKMSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RKMSFSIERF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
69%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RKMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SIERF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BPOP115.330.96
+0.84%
Popular
LADR11.14-0.08
-0.71%
LADDER CAPITAL Corp
AZN72.66-1.02
-1.38%
AstraZeneca PLC
UIS4.35-0.08
-1.81%
Unisys Corp
ADUR10.83-0.42
-3.73%
Aduro Clean Technologies Inc

SIERF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SIERF and MLPNF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SIERF and MLPNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIERF
1D Price
Change %
SIERF100%
N/A
MLPNF - SIERF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.71%
SLROF - SIERF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWXPF - SIERF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RKMSF - SIERF
20%
Poorly correlated
-15.13%
SHTLF - SIERF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More