RKUNF
Price
$5.38
Change
-$0.33 (-5.78%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
12.66B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
YUMSF
Price
$0.95
Change
-$0.11 (-10.38%)
Updated
Oct 30 closing price
Capitalization
104.01M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

RKUNF vs YUMSF

Header iconRKUNF vs YUMSF Comparison
Open Charts RKUNF vs YUMSFBanner chart's image
Rakuten Group
Price$5.38
Change-$0.33 (-5.78%)
Volume$2.46K
Capitalization12.66B
Demae Can
Price$0.95
Change-$0.11 (-10.38%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization104.01M
RKUNF vs YUMSF Comparison Chart in %
RKUNF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
YUMSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RKUNF vs. YUMSF commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RKUNF is a Hold and YUMSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (RKUNF: $5.38 vs. YUMSF: $0.95)
Brand notoriety: RKUNF and YUMSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RKUNF: 152% vs. YUMSF: 251%
Market capitalization -- RKUNF: $12.7B vs. YUMSF: $101.4M
RKUNF [@Internet Retail] is valued at $12.7B. YUMSF’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $101.4M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.38T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $52.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RKUNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYUMSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RKUNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • YUMSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both RKUNF and YUMSF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RKUNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YUMSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RKUNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • YUMSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, YUMSF is a better buy in the short-term than RKUNF.

Price Growth

RKUNF (@Internet Retail) experienced а -17.19% price change this week, while YUMSF (@Internet Retail) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was -3.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +168.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (-3.47% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RKUNF($12.7B) has a higher market cap than YUMSF($104M). RKUNF YTD gains are higher at: -0.555 vs. YUMSF (-43.253). RKUNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 419B vs. YUMSF (-2.88B). RKUNF has more cash in the bank: 5.38T vs. YUMSF (31.2B). RKUNF has higher revenues than YUMSF: RKUNF (2.39T) vs YUMSF (45.7B).
RKUNFYUMSFRKUNF / YUMSF
Capitalization12.7B104M12,212%
EBITDA419B-2.88B-14,528%
Gain YTD-0.555-43.2531%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue2.39T45.7B5,223%
Total Cash5.38T31.2B17,240%
Total Debt5.31TN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RKUNF vs YUMSF: Fundamental Ratings
RKUNF
YUMSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6729
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10087
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7787
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
211
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RKUNF's Valuation (99) in the null industry is in the same range as YUMSF (100). This means that RKUNF’s stock grew similarly to YUMSF’s over the last 12 months.

RKUNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as YUMSF (100). This means that RKUNF’s stock grew similarly to YUMSF’s over the last 12 months.

YUMSF's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as RKUNF (100). This means that YUMSF’s stock grew similarly to RKUNF’s over the last 12 months.

RKUNF's Price Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as YUMSF (87). This means that RKUNF’s stock grew similarly to YUMSF’s over the last 12 months.

RKUNF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as YUMSF (11). This means that RKUNF’s stock grew similarly to YUMSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RKUNFYUMSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
55%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RKUNF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
YUMSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SURMF0.270.08
+42.46%
SURFACE METALS INC.
AMBK16.99N/A
N/A
American Bank, Inc.
ELSSF28.97N/A
N/A
ELIS
IIPZF9.50N/A
N/A
InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust
RBGLY15.31-0.18
-1.16%
Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc.

RKUNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RKUNF has been loosely correlated with RKUNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RKUNF jumps, then RKUNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RKUNF
1D Price
Change %
RKUNF100%
-5.78%
RKUNY - RKUNF
39%
Loosely correlated
-4.26%
JMIA - RKUNF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.46%
TDUP - RKUNF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
ZLDSF - RKUNF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SATLF - RKUNF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
More

YUMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that YUMSF and ZLDSF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YUMSF and ZLDSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YUMSF
1D Price
Change %
YUMSF100%
N/A
ZLDSF - YUMSF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YAHOY - YUMSF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
RKUNF - YUMSF
0%
Poorly correlated
-5.78%
YAHOF - YUMSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SATLF - YUMSF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
More