RKUNF
Price
$5.58
Change
-$0.78 (-12.26%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
13.17B
ZLDSF
Price
$29.11
Change
+$1.71 (+6.24%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
7.39B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RKUNF vs ZLDSF

Header iconRKUNF vs ZLDSF Comparison
Open Charts RKUNF vs ZLDSFBanner chart's image
Rakuten Group
Price$5.58
Change-$0.78 (-12.26%)
Volume$2.1K
Capitalization13.17B
ZALANDO SE
Price$29.11
Change+$1.71 (+6.24%)
Volume$200
Capitalization7.39B
RKUNF vs ZLDSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RKUNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZLDSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RKUNF vs. ZLDSF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RKUNF is a Hold and ZLDSF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (RKUNF: $5.58 vs. ZLDSF: $29.11)
Brand notoriety: RKUNF and ZLDSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RKUNF: 129% vs. ZLDSF: 100%
Market capitalization -- RKUNF: $13.17B vs. ZLDSF: $7.39B
RKUNF [@Internet Retail] is valued at $13.17B. ZLDSF’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $7.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.51T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $51.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RKUNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZLDSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RKUNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZLDSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RKUNF is a better buy in the long-term than ZLDSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RKUNF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZLDSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RKUNF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ZLDSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RKUNF is a better buy in the short-term than ZLDSF.

Price Growth

RKUNF (@Internet Retail) experienced а -7.77% price change this week, while ZLDSF (@Internet Retail) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +2.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +236.35%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+2.24% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RKUNF($13.2B) has a higher market cap than ZLDSF($7.39B). RKUNF YTD gains are higher at: 3.142 vs. ZLDSF (-11.115). RKUNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 419B vs. ZLDSF (840M). RKUNF has more cash in the bank: 5.38T vs. ZLDSF (2.67B). ZLDSF has less debt than RKUNF: ZLDSF (1.69B) vs RKUNF (5.31T). RKUNF has higher revenues than ZLDSF: RKUNF (2.39T) vs ZLDSF (10.9B).
RKUNFZLDSFRKUNF / ZLDSF
Capitalization13.2B7.39B179%
EBITDA419B840M49,881%
Gain YTD3.142-11.115-28%
P/E RatioN/A24.01-
Revenue2.39T10.9B21,899%
Total Cash5.38T2.67B201,839%
Total Debt5.31T1.69B315,252%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RKUNF vs ZLDSF: Fundamental Ratings
RKUNF
ZLDSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6631
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10069
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4563
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
189
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2250

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ZLDSF's Valuation (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RKUNF (99). This means that ZLDSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RKUNF’s over the last 12 months.

ZLDSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RKUNF (100). This means that ZLDSF’s stock grew similarly to RKUNF’s over the last 12 months.

ZLDSF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as RKUNF (100). This means that ZLDSF’s stock grew similarly to RKUNF’s over the last 12 months.

RKUNF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as ZLDSF (63). This means that RKUNF’s stock grew similarly to ZLDSF’s over the last 12 months.

RKUNF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ZLDSF (89). This means that RKUNF’s stock grew significantly faster than ZLDSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RKUNFZLDSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
59%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RKUNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZLDSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EIRL67.080.55
+0.82%
iShares MSCI Ireland ETF
REAI20.01N/A
N/A
Intelligent Real Estate ETF
PJUL45.05N/A
N/A
Innovator U.S. Equity Power BffrETF™-Jul
IGHG78.59-0.03
-0.04%
ProShares Investment Grade—Intr Rt Hdgd
RBLU86.04-3.01
-3.38%
T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF

RKUNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RKUNF has been loosely correlated with RKUNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RKUNF jumps, then RKUNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RKUNF
1D Price
Change %
RKUNF100%
-12.31%
RKUNY - RKUNF
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.30%
JMIA - RKUNF
23%
Poorly correlated
+8.18%
TDUP - RKUNF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
ZLDSF - RKUNF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SATLF - RKUNF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ZLDSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ZLDSF and YUMSF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZLDSF and YUMSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZLDSF
1D Price
Change %
ZLDSF100%
N/A
YUMSF - ZLDSF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RKUNF - ZLDSF
11%
Poorly correlated
-12.31%
RKUNY - ZLDSF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
TKAYF - ZLDSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YAHOY - ZLDSF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
More