Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs WEBCX
RLBAX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.20
Change-$0.14 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.46B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$10.61
Change-$0.05 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.72M
RLBAX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. WEBCX commentary
Sep 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Buy and WEBCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 255B vs. WEBCX (33.7M). WEBCX (1.19) and RLBAX (1.15) have matching dividends . RLBAX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: RLBAX (23 years) vs WEBCX (32 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBCX (36.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: RLBAX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.89 vs. WEBCX (-0.95). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.63 vs. WEBCX (-0.78).
| RLBAX | WEBCX | RLBAX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.39 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.39 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.656 | 5.596 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 255B | 33.7M | 756,677% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.19 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.89 | -0.95 | -724% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.51 | 9.23 | 363% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.63 | -0.78 | -4,190% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.89 | -1.89 | -3,644% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement