Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs WEBCX
RLBAX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.29
Change-$0.17 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.89B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$10.57
Change-$0.05 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.02M
RLBAX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. WEBCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Hold and WEBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 264B vs. WEBCX (33M). WEBCX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: WEBCX (1.17) vs RLBAX (1.08). RLBAX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: RLBAX (23 years) vs WEBCX (33 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBCX (36.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: RLBAX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.96 vs. WEBCX (-2.30). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.76 vs. WEBCX (-2.73).
| RLBAX | WEBCX | RLBAX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.39 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.39 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.973 | 6.052 | 214% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 264B | 33M | 800,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.17 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.96 | -2.30 | -346% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.66 | 9.07 | 415% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.76 | -2.73 | -1,236% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.03 | -6.72 | -939% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement