Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs WEBCX
RLBAX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.58
Change-$0.15 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.55B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$10.75
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.11M
RLBAX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. WEBCX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Buy and WEBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 267B vs. WEBCX (34.1M). WEBCX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: WEBCX (1.17) vs RLBAX (1.10). RLBAX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: RLBAX (23 years) vs WEBCX (33 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBCX (36.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: RLBAX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.21 vs. WEBCX (-0.01). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.59 vs. WEBCX (0.94).
| RLBAX | WEBCX | RLBAX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.39 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.39 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.829 | 7.549 | 183% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 267B | 34.1M | 782,991% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.17 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.21 | -0.01 | -72,253% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.06 | 20.10 | 244% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.59 | 0.94 | 4,020% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.60 | -3.21 | -2,137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement