Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs WEBCX
RLBAX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$35.01
Change+$0.02 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets241.02B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$10.12
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.24M
RLBAX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. WEBCX commentary
Jun 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Buy and WEBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 241B vs. WEBCX (33.2M). RLBAX (1.23) and WEBCX (1.23) have matching dividends . RLBAX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: RLBAX (23 years) vs WEBCX (32 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBCX (36.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: RLBAX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.82 vs. WEBCX (-0.22). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.69 vs. WEBCX (-1.10).
| RLBAX | WEBCX | RLBAX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.39 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.39 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.069 | 0.385 | 796% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 241B | 33.2M | 725,904% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 1.23 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.82 | -0.22 | -3,115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.84 | 1.16 | 1,626% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.69 | -1.10 | -2,976% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.98 | -12.62 | -388% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement