Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs WFALX
RLBAX vs WFALX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs WFALX
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.56
Change-$0.09 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.1B
Allspring Index Asset Allocation C
Price$22.28
Change-$0.05 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.29B
RLBAX vs WFALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. WFALX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Hold and WFALX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. WFALX (1.29B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than WFALX: RLBAX (1.10) vs WFALX (0.52). RLBAX was incepted earlier than WFALX: RLBAX (23 years) vs WFALX (28 years). WFALX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WFALX (12.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFALX: RLBAX (250) vs WFALX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.12 vs. WFALX (-8.98). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.04 vs. WFALX (-6.02).
| RLBAX | WFALX | RLBAX / WFALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.82 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.86 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.770 | 9.388 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 266B | 1.29B | 20,668% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.52 | 210% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.12 | -8.98 | -102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.98 | 5.84 | 822% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.04 | -6.02 | -632% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.72 | 25.79 | 266% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement