Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBBX vs WBCCX
RLBBX vs WBCCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBBX vs WBCCX
American Funds American Balanced R2
Price$36.51
Change-$0.13 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.03B
TETON Westwood Balanced C
Price$10.53
Change-$0.05 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.68M
RLBBX vs WBCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBBX vs. WBCCX commentary
Jul 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBBX is a Buy and WBCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBBX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. WBCCX (33.7M). RLBBX pays higher dividends than WBCCX: RLBBX (1.17) vs WBCCX (0.50). RLBBX was incepted earlier than WBCCX: RLBBX (23 years) vs WBCCX (24 years). WBCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than RLBBX (1.32). RLBBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WBCCX (36.00). RLBBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBCCX: RLBBX (250) vs WBCCX (1000). RLBBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.95 vs. WBCCX (-1.42). RLBBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.73 vs. WBCCX (-0.91).
| RLBBX | WBCCX | RLBBX / WBCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.14 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.14 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.497 | 3.421 | 219% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 252B | 33.7M | 747,774% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.50 | 233% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.95 | -1.42 | -420% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.38 | 8.35 | 400% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.73 | -0.91 | -3,930% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.80 | -14.13 | -395% |