Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBBX vs WEBCX
RLBBX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBBX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced R2
Price$38.62
Change-$0.15 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.55B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$10.75
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.11M
RLBBX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBBX vs. WEBCX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBBX is a Buy and WEBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBBX has more cash in the bank: 267B vs. WEBCX (34.1M). WEBCX pays higher dividends than RLBBX: WEBCX (1.17) vs RLBBX (1.11). RLBBX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: RLBBX (23 years) vs WEBCX (33 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RLBBX (1.32). RLBBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBCX (36.00). RLBBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: RLBBX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). RLBBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.20 vs. WEBCX (-0.01). RLBBX return over 5 years is better than : 37.60 vs. WEBCX (0.94).
| RLBBX | WEBCX | RLBBX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.39 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.39 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.820 | 7.549 | 183% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 267B | 34.1M | 782,991% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 1.17 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.20 | -0.01 | -72,227% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.09 | 20.10 | 244% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.60 | 0.94 | 4,020% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.64 | -3.21 | -2,138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement