Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBCX vs TMAIX
RLBCX vs TMAIX Comparison
Open Charts RLBCX vs TMAIX
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$36.59
Change-$0.12 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.03B
Thrivent Moderate Allocation S
Price$16.43
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.97B
RLBCX vs TMAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBCX vs. TMAIX commentary
Jul 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBCX is a Buy and TMAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. TMAIX (3.97B). TMAIX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: TMAIX (2.19) vs RLBCX (1.57). RLBCX was incepted earlier than TMAIX: RLBCX (23 years) vs TMAIX (20 years). TMAIX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). TMAIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMAIX: RLBCX (250) vs TMAIX (2000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.42 vs. TMAIX (4.29). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 38.26 vs. TMAIX (27.93).
| RLBCX | TMAIX | RLBCX / TMAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.83 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.03 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.770 | 5.679 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 252B | 3.97B | 6,349% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 2.19 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.42 | 4.29 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.96 | 31.85 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.26 | 27.93 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.84 | 46.39 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement