Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBCX vs TMAIX
RLBCX vs TMAIX Comparison
Open Charts RLBCX vs TMAIX
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.75
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.62B
Thrivent Moderate Allocation S
Price$17.17
Change+$0.05 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.14B
RLBCX vs TMAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBCX vs. TMAIX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBCX is a Buy and TMAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. TMAIX (4.14B). TMAIX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: TMAIX (2.07) vs RLBCX (1.49). RLBCX was incepted earlier than TMAIX: RLBCX (23 years) vs TMAIX (20 years). TMAIX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). TMAIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMAIX: RLBCX (250) vs TMAIX (2000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.34 vs. TMAIX (4.98). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.24 vs. TMAIX (27.40).
| RLBCX | TMAIX | RLBCX / TMAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.83 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.03 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.364 | 10.965 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 266B | 4.14B | 6,419% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 2.07 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.34 | 4.98 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.26 | 41.69 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.24 | 27.40 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.18 | 56.88 | 127% |