Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBCX vs TMAIX
RLBCX vs TMAIX Comparison
Open Charts RLBCX vs TMAIX
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.39
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.06B
Thrivent Moderate Allocation S
Price$17.18
Change+$0.06 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.13B
RLBCX vs TMAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBCX vs. TMAIX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBCX is a Buy and TMAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. TMAIX (4.13B). TMAIX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: TMAIX (2.13) vs RLBCX (1.53). RLBCX was incepted earlier than TMAIX: RLBCX (23 years) vs TMAIX (20 years). TMAIX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). TMAIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMAIX: RLBCX (250) vs TMAIX (2000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.50 vs. TMAIX (7.00). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.28 vs. TMAIX (28.47).
| RLBCX | TMAIX | RLBCX / TMAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.83 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.03 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.071 | 10.571 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 263B | 4.13B | 6,370% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 2.13 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.50 | 7.00 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.14 | 36.31 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.28 | 28.47 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.06 | 59.49 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers