Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBCX vs WBCCX
RLBCX vs WBCCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBCX vs WBCCX
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.54
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.74B
TETON Westwood Balanced C
Price$10.72
Change-$0.05 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.02M
RLBCX vs WBCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBCX vs. WBCCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBCX is a Hold and WBCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. WBCCX (33M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than WBCCX: RLBCX (1.46) vs WBCCX (0.48). RLBCX was incepted earlier than WBCCX: RLBCX (23 years) vs WBCCX (24 years). WBCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WBCCX (36.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBCCX: RLBCX (250) vs WBCCX (1000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.62 vs. WBCCX (-2.98). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.95 vs. WBCCX (-5.91).
| RLBCX | WBCCX | RLBCX / WBCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 2.14 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 2.14 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.744 | 5.427 | 253% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 263B | 33M | 796,970% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 0.48 | 307% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.62 | -2.98 | -289% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.76 | 6.72 | 592% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.95 | -5.91 | -625% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.89 | -11.41 | -595% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement