Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBCX vs WBCCX
RLBCX vs WBCCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBCX vs WBCCX
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$35.58
Change+$0.07 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets243.43B
TETON Westwood Balanced C
Price$10.33
Change+$0.05 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.31M
RLBCX vs WBCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBCX vs. WBCCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBCX is a Buy and WBCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 243B vs. WBCCX (33.3M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than WBCCX: RLBCX (1.63) vs WBCCX (0.52). RLBCX was incepted earlier than WBCCX: RLBCX (23 years) vs WBCCX (24 years). WBCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WBCCX (36.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBCCX: RLBCX (250) vs WBCCX (1000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.77 vs. WBCCX (-2.22). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.95 vs. WBCCX (-7.59).
| RLBCX | WBCCX | RLBCX / WBCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 2.14 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 2.14 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.555 | 0.389 | 1,170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 243B | 33.3M | 729,730% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 0.52 | 313% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.77 | -2.22 | -305% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.28 | -1.29 | -1,653% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.95 | -7.59 | -434% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.45 | -15.71 | -359% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers