Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBCX vs WBCCX
RLBCX vs WBCCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBCX vs WBCCX
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.15
Change-$0.16 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.26B
TETON Westwood Balanced C
Price$10.81
Change-$0.04 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.92M
RLBCX vs WBCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBCX vs. WBCCX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBCX is a Hold and WBCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. WBCCX (33.9M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than WBCCX: RLBCX (1.53) vs WBCCX (0.49). RLBCX was incepted earlier than WBCCX: RLBCX (23 years) vs WBCCX (24 years). WBCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WBCCX (36.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBCCX: RLBCX (250) vs WBCCX (1000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.76 vs. WBCCX (-1.37). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 42.19 vs. WBCCX (-0.04).
| RLBCX | WBCCX | RLBCX / WBCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 2.14 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 2.14 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.593 | 6.061 | 208% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 263B | 33.9M | 775,811% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 0.49 | 310% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.76 | -1.37 | -566% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.14 | 16.02 | 307% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.19 | -0.04 | -118,321% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.25 | -5.29 | -1,499% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement