Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBCX vs WEBAX
RLBCX vs WEBAX Comparison
Open Charts RLBCX vs WEBAX
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$35.41
Change-$0.31 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets246.53B
TETON Westwood Balanced AAA
Price$10.09
Change-$0.09 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.66M
RLBCX vs WEBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBCX vs. WEBAX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBCX is a Buy and WEBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 247B vs. WEBAX (33.7M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than WEBAX: RLBCX (1.63) vs WEBAX (1.24). RLBCX was incepted earlier than WEBAX: RLBCX (23 years) vs WEBAX (34 years). WEBAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBAX (36.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBAX: RLBCX (250) vs WEBAX (1000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.94 vs. WEBAX (-0.58). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.51 vs. WEBAX (0.54).
| RLBCX | WEBAX | RLBCX / WEBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.39 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.39 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.294 | 1.992 | 216% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 247B | 33.7M | 732,938% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.24 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.94 | -0.58 | -849% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.54 | 10.78 | 293% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.51 | 0.54 | 6,717% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.99 | -10.69 | -514% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement