Ad is loading...
RLBEX vs SIIIX
RLBEX vs SIIIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 237B vs. SIIIX (49.5M). SIIIX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: SIIIX (6.55) vs RLBEX (1.91). RLBEX was incepted earlier than SIIIX: RLBEX (23 years) vs SIIIX (4 years). SIIIX (2.04) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. SIIIX (44.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than SIIIX: RLBEX (250) vs SIIIX (2500). SIIIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.59 vs. RLBEX (5.13).
| RLBEX | SIIIX | RLBEX / SIIIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.51 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 2.04 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.963 | 0.359 | 268% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 237B | 49.5M | 478,788% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 6.55 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.13 | 9.59 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.25 | 15.02 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.46 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.24 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SEVAX | 35.99 | 0.26 | +0.73% |
| NAA SMid Cap Value A | |||
| BUIIX | 22.68 | 0.15 | +0.67% |
| Buffalo International Institutional | |||
| WALSX | 13.81 | 0.05 | +0.36% |
| Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Investor | |||
| MFAIX | 25.47 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Morgan Stanley Inst Intl Advtg I | |||
| HACAX | 107.00 | -0.17 | -0.16% |
| Harbor Capital Appreciation Instl | |||