Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBFX vs SFAAX
RLBFX vs SFAAX Comparison
Open Charts RLBFX vs SFAAX
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.70
Change+$0.02 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.06B
Allspring Index Asset Allocation A
Price$41.74
Change+$0.16 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.28B
RLBFX vs SFAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBFX vs. SFAAX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBFX is a Buy and SFAAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. SFAAX (1.28B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than SFAAX: RLBFX (2.05) vs SFAAX (0.92). RLBFX was incepted earlier than SFAAX: RLBFX (23 years) vs SFAAX (39 years). SFAAX (1.11) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. SFAAX (12.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFAAX: RLBFX (250) vs SFAAX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.64 vs. SFAAX (-1.10). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.98 vs. SFAAX (10.38).
| RLBFX | SFAAX | RLBFX / SFAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.07 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.11 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.320 | 8.417 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 263B | 1.28B | 20,563% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.05 | 0.92 | 221% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.64 | -1.10 | -970% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.44 | 14.56 | 298% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.98 | 10.38 | 433% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.99 | 50.83 | 159% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement