Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBFX vs SFAAX
RLBFX vs SFAAX Comparison
Open Charts RLBFX vs SFAAX
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$35.69
Change-$0.31 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.39B
Allspring Index Asset Allocation A
Price$38.78
Change-$0.30 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.23B
RLBFX vs SFAAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBFX vs. SFAAX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBFX is a Buy and SFAAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. SFAAX (1.23B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than SFAAX: RLBFX (2.18) vs SFAAX (0.99). RLBFX was incepted earlier than SFAAX: RLBFX (23 years) vs SFAAX (39 years). SFAAX (1.11) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. SFAAX (12.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFAAX: RLBFX (250) vs SFAAX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.61 vs. SFAAX (-3.64). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.09 vs. SFAAX (9.85).
| RLBFX | SFAAX | RLBFX / SFAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.07 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.11 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.560 | 1.647 | 277% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 244B | 1.23B | 19,805% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.18 | 0.99 | 220% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.61 | -3.64 | -154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.66 | 10.59 | 318% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.09 | 9.85 | 407% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.51 | 36.97 | 164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement