Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLITX vs VFWPX
RLITX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RLITX vs VFWPX
Lazard International Strategic Eq R6
Price$16.14
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.85B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$145.26
Change+$0.53 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.11B
RLITX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLITX vs. VFWPX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLITX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68.1B vs. RLITX (1.85B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RLITX: VFWPX (2.79) vs RLITX (1.67). RLITX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RLITX (11 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RLITX (0.83) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RLITX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RLITX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RLITX (1000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.10 vs. RLITX (-1.34). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 37.84 vs. RLITX (19.76).
| RLITX | VFWPX | RLITX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.03 | 2,733% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.03 | 2,767% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.659 | 21.207 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.85B | 68.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 2.79 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.34 | 14.10 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.97 | 42.19 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.76 | 37.84 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.00 | 66.46 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement