Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLITX vs VFWPX
RLITX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RLITX vs VFWPX
Lazard International Strategic Eq R6
Price$16.15
Change+$0.06 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.83B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$141.22
Change+$0.89 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.11B
RLITX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLITX vs. VFWPX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLITX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68.1B vs. RLITX (1.83B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RLITX: VFWPX (2.79) vs RLITX (1.67). RLITX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RLITX (11 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RLITX (0.83) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RLITX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RLITX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RLITX (1000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.37 vs. RLITX (6.14). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 37.93 vs. RLITX (24.54).
| RLITX | VFWPX | RLITX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.03 | 2,733% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.03 | 2,767% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.807 | 17.522 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.83B | 68.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 2.79 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.14 | 19.37 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.57 | 34.54 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.54 | 37.93 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.79 | 50.16 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement