Ad is loading...
RLITX vs VFWPX
RLITX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RLITX vs VFWPX
Lazard International Strategic Eq R6
Price$14.03
Change-$0.20 (-1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.25B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$124.56
Change-$2.65 (-2.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.24B
RLITX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLITX vs. VFWPX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLITX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 59.2B vs. RLITX (2.25B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RLITX: VFWPX (3.04) vs RLITX (1.87). RLITX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RLITX (10 years) vs VFWPX (14 years). RLITX (0.83) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RLITX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RLITX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RLITX (1000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.00 vs. RLITX (-10.90). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 60.57 vs. RLITX (42.32).
| RLITX | VFWPX | RLITX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.03 | 2,733% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.03 | 2,767% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.564 | 6.354 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.25B | 59.2B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.87 | 3.04 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.90 | 5.00 | -218% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.94 | 6.78 | -29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.32 | 60.57 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.97 | 31.21 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers