Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLITX vs VFWPX
RLITX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RLITX vs VFWPX
Lazard International Strategic Eq R6
Price$16.31
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.9B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$140.86
Change+$0.20 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.03B
RLITX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLITX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLITX is a Buy and VFWPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68B vs. RLITX (1.9B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RLITX: VFWPX (2.76) vs RLITX (1.66). RLITX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RLITX (10 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RLITX (0.83) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RLITX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RLITX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RLITX (1000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.63 vs. RLITX (1.37). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 41.51 vs. RLITX (30.17).
| RLITX | VFWPX | RLITX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.03 | 2,733% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.03 | 2,767% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.994 | 17.798 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.9B | 68B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 2.76 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.37 | 12.63 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.98 | 41.37 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 41.51 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.96 | 48.38 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement