Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLITX vs VFWPX
RLITX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RLITX vs VFWPX
Lazard International Strategic Eq R6
Price$15.57
Change-$0.03 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.09B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$135.22
Change-$1.95 (-1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.25B
RLITX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLITX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jun 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLITX is a StrongBuy and VFWPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 65.3B vs. RLITX (2.09B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RLITX: VFWPX (2.83) vs RLITX (1.71). RLITX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RLITX (10 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RLITX (0.83) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RLITX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RLITX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RLITX (1000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.86 vs. RLITX (-1.05). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 42.48 vs. RLITX (27.23).
| RLITX | VFWPX | RLITX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.03 | 2,733% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.03 | 2,767% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.727 | 14.681 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.09B | 65.3B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 2.83 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.05 | 11.86 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.21 | 34.53 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.23 | 42.48 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.78 | 38.81 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement