RLLWF vs TOTDY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLLWF is a Hold and TOTDY is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RLLWF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTOTDY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- RLLWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TOTDY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
TOTDY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- TOTDY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
RLLWF (@Building Products) experienced а +7.30% price change this week, while TOTDY (@Building Products) price change was +11.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.46%.
Reported Earning Dates
TOTDY is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Building Products (-2.41% weekly)The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.
| RLLWF | TOTDY | RLLWF / TOTDY | |
| Capitalization | 3.01B | 5.25B | 57% |
| EBITDA | 242M | 65.6B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | 12.772 | 12.204 | 105% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.40 | 18.48 | 132% |
| Revenue | 1.23B | 692B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 28.4M | 98.1B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 237M | 24.7B | 1% |
RLLWF | TOTDY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 40 Fair valued | 24 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | 11 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TOTDY's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as RLLWF (40). This means that TOTDY’s stock grew similarly to RLLWF’s over the last 12 months.
RLLWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as TOTDY (100). This means that RLLWF’s stock grew similarly to TOTDY’s over the last 12 months.
TOTDY's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RLLWF (86). This means that TOTDY’s stock grew significantly faster than RLLWF’s over the last 12 months.
RLLWF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as TOTDY (51). This means that RLLWF’s stock grew similarly to TOTDY’s over the last 12 months.
RLLWF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TOTDY (91). This means that RLLWF’s stock grew significantly faster than TOTDY’s over the last 12 months.
| TOTDY | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% |
RLLWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RLLWF has been loosely correlated with AIRJ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RLLWF jumps, then AIRJ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RLLWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLLWF | 100% | N/A | ||
| AIRJ - RLLWF | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.85% | ||
| NDRBF - RLLWF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| JSGRY - RLLWF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TOTDY - RLLWF | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.37% | ||
| NPSGF - RLLWF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
TOTDY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TOTDY has been loosely correlated with DKILY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TOTDY jumps, then DKILY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TOTDY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOTDY | 100% | +0.37% | ||
| DKILY - TOTDY | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| TOTDF - TOTDY | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| JSGRY - TOTDY | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| JCI - TOTDY | 27% Poorly correlated | -4.00% | ||
| OC - TOTDY | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.86% | ||
More | ||||