Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLNAX vs VFWPX
RLNAX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RLNAX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv International Devd Mkts A
Price$49.80
Change-$0.37 (-0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$146.94
Change-$0.85 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.34B
RLNAX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLNAX vs. VFWPX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLNAX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 71.3B vs. RLNAX (1.11B). VFWPX (2.68) and RLNAX (2.63) have matching dividends . RLNAX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RLNAX (17 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RLNAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RLNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RLNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RLNAX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.14 vs. RLNAX (14.01). RLNAX return over 5 years is better than : 62.73 vs. VFWPX (47.67).
| RLNAX | VFWPX | RLNAX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.03 | 4,200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.03 | 4,267% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.336 | 23.932 | 93% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 71.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 2.68 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.01 | 15.14 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.33 | 63.23 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.73 | 47.67 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.12 | 81.43 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement