Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLNAX vs VFWPX
RLNAX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RLNAX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv International Devd Mkts A
Price$49.80
Change-$0.16 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$148.50
Change-$0.42 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.54B
RLNAX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLNAX vs. VFWPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLNAX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. RLNAX (1.09B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RLNAX: VFWPX (2.70) vs RLNAX (2.56). RLNAX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RLNAX (17 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RLNAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RLNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RLNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RLNAX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.62 vs. RLNAX (19.38). RLNAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.40 vs. VFWPX (33.14).
| RLNAX | VFWPX | RLNAX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.03 | 4,200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.03 | 4,267% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.434 | 24.879 | 86% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 75.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.56 | 2.70 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.38 | 21.62 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.00 | 45.59 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.40 | 33.14 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.84 | 69.04 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement