Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLNAX vs VFWPX
RLNAX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RLNAX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv International Devd Mkts A
Price$49.30
Change-$0.12 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$142.93
Change-$0.24 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.03B
RLNAX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLNAX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLNAX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68B vs. RLNAX (1.12B). VFWPX (2.76) and RLNAX (2.68) have matching dividends . RLNAX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RLNAX (17 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RLNAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RLNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RLNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RLNAX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). RLNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.87 vs. VFWPX (17.82). RLNAX return over 5 years is better than : 58.21 vs. VFWPX (42.45).
| RLNAX | VFWPX | RLNAX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.03 | 4,200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.03 | 4,267% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.215 | 19.900 | 102% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 68B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.68 | 2.76 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.87 | 17.82 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.50 | 40.91 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.21 | 42.45 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.83 | 53.89 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement