Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLNAX vs VFWPX
RLNAX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RLNAX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv International Devd Mkts A
Price$50.61
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$150.52
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.16B
RLNAX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLNAX vs. VFWPX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLNAX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 74.2B vs. RLNAX (1.11B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RLNAX: VFWPX (2.74) vs RLNAX (2.57). RLNAX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RLNAX (17 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RLNAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RLNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RLNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RLNAX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.07 vs. RLNAX (15.91). RLNAX return over 5 years is better than : 58.47 vs. VFWPX (45.32).
| RLNAX | VFWPX | RLNAX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.03 | 4,200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.03 | 4,267% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.409 | 26.221 | 89% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 74.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.57 | 2.74 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.91 | 18.07 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.19 | 63.09 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.47 | 45.32 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.16 | 70.07 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement