Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLNCX vs VFWPX
RLNCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RLNCX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv International Devd Mkts C
Price$50.96
Change-$0.52 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$150.58
Change-$1.33 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.16B
RLNCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLNCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLNCX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 74.2B vs. RLNCX (1.13B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RLNCX: VFWPX (2.74) vs RLNCX (1.86). RLNCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RLNCX (17 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RLNCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RLNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RLNCX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX (17.09) and RLNCX (16.34) have marching annual gain over last year. RLNCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.37 vs. VFWPX (45.81).
| RLNCX | VFWPX | RLNCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.03 | 6,700% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.03 | 6,767% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.649 | 27.387 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 74.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 2.74 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.34 | 17.09 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.90 | 65.77 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.37 | 45.81 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.05 | 71.24 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement