Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLNCX vs VFWPX
RLNCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RLNCX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv International Devd Mkts C
Price$49.57
Change-$0.08 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$144.73
Change-$0.49 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.11B
RLNCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLNCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLNCX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68.1B vs. RLNCX (1.1B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RLNCX: VFWPX (2.79) vs RLNCX (1.98). RLNCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RLNCX (17 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RLNCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RLNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RLNCX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.90 vs. RLNCX (11.82). RLNCX return over 5 years is better than : 48.18 vs. VFWPX (38.31).
| RLNCX | VFWPX | RLNCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.03 | 6,700% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.03 | 6,767% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.024 | 21.617 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 68.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.98 | 2.79 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.82 | 13.90 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.89 | 42.12 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.18 | 38.31 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.95 | 65.78 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement