Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLNCX vs VFWPX
RLNCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RLNCX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv International Devd Mkts C
Price$50.49
Change-$0.16 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$149.08
Change-$0.38 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.34B
RLNCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLNCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLNCX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 71.3B vs. RLNCX (1.12B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RLNCX: VFWPX (2.68) vs RLNCX (1.91). RLNCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RLNCX (17 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RLNCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RLNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RLNCX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.36 vs. RLNCX (14.96). RLNCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.82 vs. VFWPX (44.42).
| RLNCX | VFWPX | RLNCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.03 | 6,700% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.03 | 6,767% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.252 | 25.168 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 71.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 2.68 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.96 | 18.36 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.31 | 53.18 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.82 | 44.42 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.58 | 74.50 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement