Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLNCX vs VFWPX
RLNCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RLNCX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv International Devd Mkts C
Price$48.23
Change+$0.18 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$139.63
Change+$0.39 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.03B
RLNCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLNCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLNCX is a Hold and VFWPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68B vs. RLNCX (1.09B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RLNCX: VFWPX (2.76) vs RLNCX (1.94). RLNCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RLNCX (17 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RLNCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RLNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RLNCX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). RLNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.44 vs. VFWPX (10.44). RLNCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.21 vs. VFWPX (38.63).
| RLNCX | VFWPX | RLNCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.03 | 6,700% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.03 | 6,767% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.344 | 16.609 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 68B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 2.76 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.44 | 10.44 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.54 | 40.59 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.21 | 38.63 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.66 | 45.84 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement