RMBI
Price
$14.69
Change
+$0.17 (+1.17%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
141.97M
48 days until earnings call
SPXXF
Price
$13.52
Change
+$5.74 (+73.78%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
128.77M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMBI vs SPXXF

Header iconRMBI vs SPXXF Comparison
Open Charts RMBI vs SPXXFBanner chart's image
Richmond Mutual Ban
Price$14.69
Change+$0.17 (+1.17%)
Volume$15.65K
Capitalization141.97M
Sparebanken Nord Norge
Price$13.52
Change+$5.74 (+73.78%)
Volume$250
Capitalization128.77M
RMBI vs SPXXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RMBI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMBI vs. SPXXF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMBI is a Buy and SPXXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (RMBI: $14.69 vs. SPXXF: $13.52)
Brand notoriety: RMBI and SPXXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMBI: 32% vs. SPXXF: 8%
Market capitalization -- RMBI: $141.97M vs. SPXXF: $128.77M
RMBI [@Regional Banks] is valued at $141.97M. SPXXF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $128.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMBI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSPXXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RMBI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SPXXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMBI is a better buy in the long-term than SPXXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RMBI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RMBI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

RMBI (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.23% price change this week, while SPXXF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

RMBI is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.26% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMBI($142M) has a higher market cap than SPXXF($129M). SPXXF YTD gains are higher at: 73.715 vs. RMBI (6.294).
RMBISPXXFRMBI / SPXXF
Capitalization142M129M110%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.29473.7159%
P/E Ratio15.28N/A-
Revenue44.9MN/A-
Total Cash10.4MN/A-
Total Debt267MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMBI: Fundamental Ratings
RMBI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
77
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
58
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMBISPXXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
9%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
9%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
53%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
51%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RMBI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTTH0.050.01
+14.34%
CTT Pharmaceutical Holdings, Inc.
HKHHF71.00N/A
N/A
Heineken Holding N.V.
KURRF13.00N/A
N/A
Kuraray Co.
IPGGF0.11N/A
N/A
IMPERIUM TECHNOLOGY GROUP LTD.
AGYTF0.09N/A
N/A
Allergy Therapeutics Plc.

RMBI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBI has been loosely correlated with CWBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RMBI jumps, then CWBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMBI
1D Price
Change %
RMBI100%
+1.17%
CWBC - RMBI
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.08%
UBFO - RMBI
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
FRBA - RMBI
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
HBNC - RMBI
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.69%
FCCO - RMBI
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
More

SPXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SPXXF and FMFP have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPXXF and FMFP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPXXF
1D Price
Change %
SPXXF100%
N/A
FMFP - SPXXF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
RMBI - SPXXF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
NODB - SPXXF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBTN - SPXXF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
PGNN - SPXXF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More