Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMBKX vs RPFGX
RMBKX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts RMBKX vs RPFGX
RMB Mendon Financial Services A
Price$49.94
Change+$0.11 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets211.16M
RMBKX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMBKX vs. RPFGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMBKX is a Hold and RPFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.12B vs. RMBKX (211M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than RMBKX: RPFGX (1.30) vs RMBKX (1.17). RMBKX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: RMBKX (26 years) vs RPFGX (35 years). RMBKX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). RMBKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RMBKX initial investment is less costly to investors than RPFGX (5%) vs RPFGX (5%). RPFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBKX: RPFGX (1000) vs RMBKX (2500). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.37 vs. RMBKX (-6.31). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 89.59 vs. RMBKX (41.52).
| RMBKX | RPFGX | RMBKX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.94 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.94 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.240 | 17.917 | -1% |
| Front Load | 5% | 5% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 211M | 1.12B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.30 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.31 | 12.37 | -51% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.46 | 60.08 | -4% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.52 | 89.59 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.12 | 101.51 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement