Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMBNX vs RPFGX
RMBNX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts RMBNX vs RPFGX
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$42.60
Change+$0.25 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.81M
RMBNX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMBNX vs. RPFGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMBNX is a Hold and RPFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.12B vs. RMBNX (210M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than RMBNX: RPFGX (1.30) vs RMBNX (0.70). RMBNX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: RMBNX (21 years) vs RPFGX (35 years). RMBNX (2.14) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). RMBNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: RPFGX (1000) vs RMBNX (2500). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.33 vs. RMBNX (-7.57). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 87.50 vs. RMBNX (31.60).
| RMBNX | RPFGX | RMBNX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.94 | 228% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.94 | 228% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.466 | 17.682 | -8% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 210M | 1.12B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.30 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.57 | 11.33 | -67% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.25 | 59.76 | -12% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.60 | 87.50 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.91 | 101.11 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement