Ad is loading...
RMBNX vs TFIFX
RMBNX vs TFIFX Comparison
Open Charts RMBNX vs TFIFX
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$37.50
Change+$2.10 (+5.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets178.03M
T. Rowe Price Financial Services I
Price$40.41
Change+$2.98 (+7.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.62B
RMBNX vs TFIFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMBNX vs. TFIFX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMBNX is a Hold and TFIFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFIFX has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. RMBNX (178M). TFIFX pays higher dividends than RMBNX: TFIFX (1.23) vs RMBNX (0.74). RMBNX was incepted earlier than TFIFX: RMBNX (20 years) vs TFIFX (8 years). RMBNX (2.12) is less costly to investors than TFIFX (0.82). RMBNX (49.00) and TFIFX (46.90) have comparable annual turnover. RMBNX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFIFX: RMBNX (2500) vs TFIFX (500000). RMBNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.01 vs. TFIFX (-2.79). TFIFX return over 5 years is better than : 89.91 vs. RMBNX (54.36).
| RMBNX | TFIFX | RMBNX / TFIFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.79 | 268% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.82 | 259% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -17.636 | -11.971 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 178M | 1.62B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 1.23 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.01 | -2.79 | -108% |
| Returns for 3 years | -23.46 | 15.39 | -152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.36 | 89.91 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...