RMCO
Price
$1.00
Change
+$0.02 (+2.04%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
16.55M
SCM
Price
$12.24
Change
+$0.21 (+1.75%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
312.91M
25 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

RMCO vs SCM

Header iconRMCO vs SCM Comparison
Open Charts RMCO vs SCMBanner chart's image
Royalty Management Holding
Price$1.00
Change+$0.02 (+2.04%)
Volume$69.88K
Capitalization16.55M
STELLUS CAPITAL INVESTMENT
Price$12.24
Change+$0.21 (+1.75%)
Volume$205.37K
Capitalization312.91M
RMCO vs SCM Comparison Chart
Loading...
RMCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMCO vs. SCM commentary
Apr 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMCO is a Hold and SCM is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 12, 2025
Stock price -- (RMCO: $1.00 vs. SCM: $12.24)
Brand notoriety: RMCO and SCM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMCO: 340% vs. SCM: 90%
Market capitalization -- RMCO: $16.55M vs. SCM: $312.91M
RMCO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $16.55M. SCM’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $312.91M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMCO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSCM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • RMCO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SCM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCM is a better buy in the long-term than RMCO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RMCO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RMCO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SCM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCM is a better buy in the short-term than RMCO.

Price Growth

RMCO (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.19% price change this week, while SCM (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

RMCO is expected to report earnings on Mar 22, 2023.

SCM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.84% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCM($313M) has a higher market cap than RMCO($16.6M). RMCO YTD gains are higher at: 0.190 vs. SCM (-8.603).
RMCOSCMRMCO / SCM
Capitalization16.6M313M5%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.190-8.603-2%
P/E RatioN/A16.21-
RevenueN/A21.2M-
Total Cash98.4KN/A-
Total DebtN/A576M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SCM: Fundamental Ratings
SCM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
83
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
13
SMR RATING
1..100
15
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMCOSCM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RMCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIUSX28.44N/A
N/A
Macquarie Opportunity A
JDSCX27.77N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Small Cap Blend I
SCSIX33.79N/A
N/A
Sterling Capital SmCp Val R6
CISIX45.00N/A
N/A
Calvert US Large Cap Core Rspnb Idx I
BPGSX11.55N/A
N/A
Boston Partners Global Sustainablty Ins

RMCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMCO and STEP have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMCO and STEP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMCO
1D Price
Change %
RMCO100%
+2.55%
STEP - RMCO
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.47%
SCM - RMCO
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
SEIC - RMCO
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.89%
WT - RMCO
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.27%
VINP - RMCO
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.45%
More

SCM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCM has been closely correlated with HRZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCM jumps, then HRZN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCM
1D Price
Change %
SCM100%
+1.75%
HRZN - SCM
70%
Closely correlated
+1.86%
FDUS - SCM
70%
Closely correlated
N/A
NMFC - SCM
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
GLAD - SCM
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.77%
MFIC - SCM
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
More