RMCO
Price
$3.14
Change
+$0.05 (+1.62%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:43 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
46.48M
4 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WT
Price
$10.95
Change
-$0.15 (-1.35%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.54B
71 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMCO vs WT

Header iconRMCO vs WT Comparison
Open Charts RMCO vs WTBanner chart's image
Royalty Management Holding
Price$3.14
Change+$0.05 (+1.62%)
Volume$200
Capitalization46.48M
WisdomTree
Price$10.95
Change-$0.15 (-1.35%)
Volume$52.23K
Capitalization1.54B
RMCO vs WT Comparison Chart in %
RMCO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMCO vs. WT commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMCO is a Hold and WT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (RMCO: $3.07 vs. WT: $10.95)
Brand notoriety: RMCO: Not notable vs. WT: Notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMCO: 86% vs. WT: 104%
Market capitalization -- RMCO: $46.48M vs. WT: $1.54B
RMCO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $46.48M. WT’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $157.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMCO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • RMCO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WT is a better buy in the long-term than RMCO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RMCO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RMCO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMCO is a better buy in the short-term than WT.

Price Growth

RMCO (@Investment Managers) experienced а -6.40% price change this week, while WT (@Investment Managers) price change was -5.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

RMCO is expected to report earnings on Nov 24, 2025.

WT is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.61% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WT($1.54B) has a higher market cap than RMCO($46.5M). RMCO YTD gains are higher at: 214.899 vs. WT (5.437). WT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 155M vs. RMCO (-130.17K). WT has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. RMCO (147K). RMCO has less debt than WT: RMCO (613K) vs WT (515M). WT has higher revenues than RMCO: WT (457M) vs RMCO (2.64M).
RMCOWTRMCO / WT
Capitalization46.5M1.54B3%
EBITDA-130.17K155M-0%
Gain YTD214.8995.4373,952%
P/E RatioN/A17.11-
Revenue2.64M457M1%
Total Cash147K106M0%
Total Debt613K515M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WT: Fundamental Ratings
WT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
69
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
27
SMR RATING
1..100
39
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
94
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMCOWT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RMCO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OSSIX22.960.11
+0.48%
Invesco Main Street Small Cap R6
EGFFX41.58N/A
N/A
Edgewood Growth Retail
CGJAX74.48N/A
N/A
Calvert US Large Cap Growth Rspnb Idx A
CFGIX18.48N/A
N/A
Cromwell Foresight Global Infras Instl
IRFIX9.21-0.04
-0.43%
Cohen & Steers International Realty I

RMCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMCO and WT have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMCO and WT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMCO
1D Price
Change %
RMCO100%
-0.49%
WT - RMCO
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
SCM - RMCO
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
DBRG - RMCO
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
PSBD - RMCO
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
SAMG - RMCO
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
More

WT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WT has been closely correlated with CG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WT jumps, then CG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WT
1D Price
Change %
WT100%
-1.35%
CG - WT
66%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
KKR - WT
66%
Loosely correlated
+2.91%
JHG - WT
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
AMG - WT
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
AMP - WT
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
More