RMCO
Price
$2.15
Change
-$0.04 (-1.83%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
32.25M
WT
Price
$13.89
Change
-$0.24 (-1.70%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.08B
28 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMCO vs WT

Header iconRMCO vs WT Comparison
Open Charts RMCO vs WTBanner chart's image
Royalty Management Holding
Price$2.15
Change-$0.04 (-1.83%)
Volume$100
Capitalization32.25M
WisdomTree
Price$13.89
Change-$0.24 (-1.70%)
Volume$35.82K
Capitalization2.08B
RMCO vs WT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RMCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMCO vs. WT commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMCO is a Buy and WT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (RMCO: $2.19 vs. WT: $14.14)
Brand notoriety: RMCO: Not notable vs. WT: Notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMCO: 61% vs. WT: 49%
Market capitalization -- RMCO: $32.25M vs. WT: $2.08B
RMCO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $32.25M. WT’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $2.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $177.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMCO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • RMCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, WT is a better buy in the long-term than RMCO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RMCO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RMCO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMCO is a better buy in the short-term than WT.

Price Growth

RMCO (@Investment Managers) experienced а +9.50% price change this week, while WT (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

WT is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.00% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WT($2.08B) has a higher market cap than RMCO($32.2M). RMCO YTD gains are higher at: 124.375 vs. WT (35.809). WT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 125M vs. RMCO (-130.17K). WT has more cash in the bank: 291M vs. RMCO (147K). RMCO has less debt than WT: RMCO (613K) vs WT (515M). WT has higher revenues than RMCO: WT (445M) vs RMCO (2.64M).
RMCOWTRMCO / WT
Capitalization32.2M2.08B2%
EBITDA-130.17K125M-0%
Gain YTD124.37535.809347%
P/E RatioN/A34.49-
Revenue2.64M445M1%
Total Cash147K291M0%
Total Debt613K515M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WT: Fundamental Ratings
WT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
86
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
16
SMR RATING
1..100
58
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
12
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMCOWT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RMCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SDVSX17.71N/A
N/A
Sit Dividend Growth S
PGOYX84.52N/A
N/A
Putnam Large Cap Growth Y
IPMSX20.19N/A
N/A
Voya Index Plus MidCap Port S
PBSYX16.73N/A
N/A
Polen US Small Company Growth Y
OSCAX23.10N/A
N/A
Invesco Main Street Small Cap A

RMCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMCO and SCM have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMCO and SCM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMCO
1D Price
Change %
RMCO100%
-0.45%
SCM - RMCO
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
WT - RMCO
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
SAMG - RMCO
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
SAR - RMCO
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
GBDC - RMCO
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
More

WT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WT has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WT jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WT
1D Price
Change %
WT100%
-1.46%
JHG - WT
70%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
KKR - WT
68%
Closely correlated
-1.65%
CG - WT
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
AMP - WT
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
EQH - WT
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
More