Advertisement
RMD vs RSMDF
To understand the difference between Resmed Inc. (RMD) vs. Resmed Inc. - Chess Depository Interest (RSMDF) it is enough to know the definitions of Chess Depository Interest
Chess Depository Interest - Chess Depositary Interest (CDI) is the instrument developed by a subsidiary of the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) that gives investors the same beneficial interests in foreign companies and funds as holding these shares and funds directly on their foreign exchange. CDIs investors receive W8-BEN and leverage the Australia-US tax treaty to reduce withholding tax on foreign income.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RMD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRSMDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- RMD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RSMDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RMD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RSMDF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RMD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- RSMDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
RMD (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -4.49% price change this week, while RSMDF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.12%.
Reported Earning Dates
RMD is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
RSMDF is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+0.60% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| RMD | RSMDF | RMD / RSMDF | |
| Capitalization | 40.3B | 40.3B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 1.92B | 1.92B | 100% |
| Gain YTD | 21.201 | -27.058 | -78% |
| P/E Ratio | 28.96 | 17.49 | 166% |
| Revenue | 5.15B | 5.15B | 100% |
| Total Cash | 1.21B | 1.21B | 100% |
| Total Debt | 852M | 852M | 100% |
RMD | RSMDF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 34 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 38 Fair valued | 29 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | 90 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RSMDF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is in the same range as RMD (38) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that RSMDF’s stock grew similarly to RMD’s over the last 12 months.
RMD's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RSMDF (100) in the null industry. This means that RMD’s stock grew somewhat faster than RSMDF’s over the last 12 months.
RMD's SMR Rating (100) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as RSMDF (100) in the null industry. This means that RMD’s stock grew similarly to RSMDF’s over the last 12 months.
RMD's Price Growth Rating (21) in the Medical Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for RSMDF (90) in the null industry. This means that RMD’s stock grew significantly faster than RSMDF’s over the last 12 months.
RMD's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as RSMDF (100) in the null industry. This means that RMD’s stock grew similarly to RSMDF’s over the last 12 months.
| RMD | RSMDF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 43% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 40% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 37% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 34% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 63% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 34% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VNAM | 22.88 | 0.27 | +1.20% |
| Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF | |||
| SMRI | 34.04 | 0.10 | +0.30% |
| Bushido Capital US Equity ETF | |||
| NMAR | 28.35 | 0.07 | +0.26% |
| Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buffr ETF - Mar | |||
| IG | 20.89 | 0.05 | +0.24% |
| Principal Investment Grd Corp Actv ETF | |||
| CMF | 55.81 | -0.02 | -0.04% |
| iShares California Muni Bond ETF | |||
RMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMD has been loosely correlated with SOLV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RMD jumps, then SOLV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMD | 100% | -2.33% | ||
| SOLV - RMD | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| RVTY - RMD | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| SYK - RMD | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| IDXX - RMD | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| MTD - RMD | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
More | ||||
RSMDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RSMDF and NAOV have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSMDF and NAOV's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RSMDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSMDF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NAOV - RSMDF | 30% Poorly correlated | -4.30% | ||
| RMD - RSMDF | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.33% | ||
| PFGTF - RSMDF | 19% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| POSC - RSMDF | 9% Poorly correlated | -4.71% | ||
| SAFLF - RSMDF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||