Ad is loading...
RMEBX vs WLCAX
RMEBX vs WLCAX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs WLCAX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$53.26
Change+$0.76 (+1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
Allspring Large Company Value A
Price$12.82
Change+$0.20 (+1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets223.4M
RMEBX vs WLCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. WLCAX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and WLCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. WLCAX (223M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than WLCAX: RMEBX (1.18) vs WLCAX (1.02). RMEBX was incepted earlier than WLCAX: RMEBX (11 years) vs WLCAX (17 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than WLCAX (0.96). WLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 237.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLCAX: RMEBX (250) vs WLCAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.74 vs. WLCAX (-9.06). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 52.21 vs. WLCAX (19.48).
| RMEBX | WLCAX | RMEBX / WLCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.82 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.96 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.724 | -4.167 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 95.8B | 223M | 42,960% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 1.02 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.74 | -9.06 | -19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.82 | 1.27 | 457% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.21 | 19.48 | 268% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.41 | -15.46 | -345% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...