Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs WLCAX
RMEBX vs WLCAX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs WLCAX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.62
Change+$0.26 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.17B
Allspring Large Company Value A
Price$14.46
Change+$0.05 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets250M
RMEBX vs WLCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. WLCAX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and WLCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. WLCAX (250M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than WLCAX: RMEBX (1.12) vs WLCAX (0.92). RMEBX was incepted earlier than WLCAX: RMEBX (11 years) vs WLCAX (17 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than WLCAX (0.96). WLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 237.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLCAX: RMEBX (250) vs WLCAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.69 vs. WLCAX (-1.81). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.63 vs. WLCAX (24.15).
| RMEBX | WLCAX | RMEBX / WLCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.82 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.96 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.183 | 9.638 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 108B | 250M | 43,200% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.92 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.69 | -1.81 | -424% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.84 | 26.44 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.63 | 24.15 | 230% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.05 | -3.70 | -2,004% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement