Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SFLNX
RMFCX vs SFLNX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SFLNX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.18
Change-$0.20 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.3B
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Idx
Price$30.95
Change-$0.13 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.22B
RMFCX vs SFLNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SFLNX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SFLNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. SFLNX (10.2B). SFLNX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: SFLNX (1.63) vs RMFCX (1.24). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SFLNX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SFLNX (18 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than SFLNX (0.25). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. SFLNX (8.00). SFLNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: SFLNX (0) vs RMFCX (250). SFLNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.66 vs. RMFCX (7.96). SFLNX return over 5 years is better than : 96.36 vs. RMFCX (60.22).
| RMFCX | SFLNX | RMFCX / SFLNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.25 | 364% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.25 | 364% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.767 | 11.091 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110B | 10.2B | 1,078% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.63 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.96 | 14.66 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.87 | 53.87 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.22 | 96.36 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.48 | 134.40 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement