Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SFLNX
RMFCX vs SFLNX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SFLNX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.20
Change+$0.11 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.47B
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Idx
Price$31.64
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.49B
RMFCX vs SFLNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SFLNX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and SFLNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. SFLNX (10.5B). SFLNX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: SFLNX (1.58) vs RMFCX (1.20). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SFLNX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SFLNX (19 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than SFLNX (0.25). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. SFLNX (8.00). SFLNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: SFLNX (0) vs RMFCX (250). SFLNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.98 vs. RMFCX (7.44). SFLNX return over 5 years is better than : 96.49 vs. RMFCX (60.80).
| RMFCX | SFLNX | RMFCX / SFLNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.25 | 364% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.25 | 364% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.964 | 13.568 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 112B | 10.5B | 1,067% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.58 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.44 | 12.98 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.84 | 68.36 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.80 | 96.49 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.21 | 132.05 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers