Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SLCVX
RMFCX vs SLCVX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SLCVX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.07
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.9B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value I
Price$29.38
Change-$0.16 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.54M
RMFCX vs SLCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SLCVX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SLCVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. SLCVX (18.5M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than SLCVX: RMFCX (1.26) vs SLCVX (0.00). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SLCVX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SLCVX (31 years). SLCVX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SLCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX (250) and SLCVX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.77 vs. SLCVX (0.65). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.95 vs. SLCVX (31.93).
| RMFCX | SLCVX | RMFCX / SLCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.88 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.88 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.721 | 13.043 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110B | 18.5M | 594,595% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.77 | 0.65 | 1,194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.69 | 6.10 | 372% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.95 | 31.93 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.02 | 26.59 | 297% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement