Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SLCVX
RMFCX vs SLCVX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SLCVX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.64
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value I
Price$28.41
Change+$0.27 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.6M
RMFCX vs SLCVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SLCVX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SLCVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. SLCVX (18.6M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than SLCVX: RMFCX (1.31) vs SLCVX (0.00). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SLCVX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SLCVX (31 years). SLCVX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SLCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX (250) and SLCVX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.01 vs. SLCVX (-2.53). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.66 vs. SLCVX (28.67).
| RMFCX | SLCVX | RMFCX / SLCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.88 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.88 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.919 | 8.272 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 105B | 18.6M | 564,516% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.01 | -2.53 | -356% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.82 | 6.71 | 266% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.66 | 28.67 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.47 | 19.81 | 356% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement