Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SLCVX
RMFCX vs SLCVX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SLCVX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.45
Change+$0.16 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.64B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value I
Price$29.11
Change+$0.18 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.7M
RMFCX vs SLCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SLCVX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SLCVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. SLCVX (18.7M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than SLCVX: RMFCX (1.27) vs SLCVX (0.00). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SLCVX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SLCVX (31 years). SLCVX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SLCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX (250) and SLCVX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.23 vs. SLCVX (-2.00). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.17 vs. SLCVX (35.31).
| RMFCX | SLCVX | RMFCX / SLCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.88 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.88 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.578 | 11.312 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109B | 18.7M | 582,888% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.23 | -2.00 | -412% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.78 | 18.61 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.17 | 35.31 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.07 | 23.75 | 320% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement