Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SLCVX
RMFCX vs SLCVX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SLCVX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.45
Change+$0.07 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.34B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value I
Price$29.56
Change-$0.03 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.61M
RMFCX vs SLCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SLCVX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SLCVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. SLCVX (18.6M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than SLCVX: RMFCX (1.24) vs SLCVX (0.00). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SLCVX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SLCVX (31 years). SLCVX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SLCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX (250) and SLCVX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.71 vs. SLCVX (1.86). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.41 vs. SLCVX (34.06).
| RMFCX | SLCVX | RMFCX / SLCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.88 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.88 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.421 | 13.736 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109B | 18.6M | 586,022% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.71 | 1.86 | 414% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.16 | 15.51 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.41 | 34.06 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.12 | 37.34 | 244% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement