Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SLCVX
RMFCX vs SLCVX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SLCVX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.10
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value I
Price$29.22
Change-$0.11 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.03M
RMFCX vs SLCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SLCVX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and SLCVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. SLCVX (18M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than SLCVX: RMFCX (1.20) vs SLCVX (0.00). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SLCVX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SLCVX (31 years). SLCVX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SLCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX (250) and SLCVX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.11 vs. SLCVX (-1.74). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.28 vs. SLCVX (29.55).
| RMFCX | SLCVX | RMFCX / SLCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.88 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.88 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.779 | 12.851 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 113B | 18M | 627,778% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.11 | -1.74 | -466% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.61 | 20.70 | 211% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.28 | 29.55 | 201% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.90 | 39.43 | 238% |