Ad is loading...
RMFCX vs SLCVX
RMFCX vs SLCVX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SLCVX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.20
Change-$1.36 (-2.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.3B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value I
Price$24.09
Change-$0.73 (-2.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.19M
RMFCX vs SLCVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SLCVX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and SLCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 98.3B vs. SLCVX (17.2M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than SLCVX: RMFCX (1.34) vs SLCVX (0.00). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SLCVX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SLCVX (31 years). SLCVX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SLCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX (250) and SLCVX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.11 vs. SLCVX (-14.15). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.06 vs. SLCVX (37.43).
| RMFCX | SLCVX | RMFCX / SLCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.88 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.88 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.578 | -4.502 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 98.3B | 17.2M | 571,512% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.11 | -14.15 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.15 | -8.18 | -87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.06 | 37.43 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.78 | 5.68 | 1,000% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers