Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs SLCVX
RMFCX vs SLCVX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SLCVX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$58.27
Change+$0.43 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.24B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value I
Price$28.97
Change+$0.24 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.69M
RMFCX vs SLCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SLCVX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SLCVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. SLCVX (18.7M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than SLCVX: RMFCX (1.31) vs SLCVX (0.00). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SLCVX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SLCVX (31 years). SLCVX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). SLCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX (250) and SLCVX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.64 vs. SLCVX (0.28). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 63.87 vs. SLCVX (43.43).
| RMFCX | SLCVX | RMFCX / SLCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.88 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.88 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.403 | 10.543 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 106B | 18.7M | 566,845% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.64 | 0.28 | 3,454% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.42 | 15.43 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.87 | 43.43 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.11 | 24.97 | 305% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement