Ad is loading...
RMFCX vs STRAX
RMFCX vs STRAX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs STRAX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$53.56
Change+$3.33 (+6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.19B
Sterling Capital Behav Lg Cp Val Eq R6
Price$29.43
Change+$1.80 (+6.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.79M
RMFCX vs STRAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. STRAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and STRAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 92.2B vs. STRAX (34.8M). STRAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: STRAX (1.90) vs RMFCX (1.34). RMFCX was incepted earlier than STRAX: RMFCX (23 years) vs STRAX (7 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than STRAX (0.78). STRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.98 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than STRAX: RMFCX (250) vs STRAX (10000000). STRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.08 vs. RMFCX (-4.43). STRAX return over 5 years is better than : 91.22 vs. RMFCX (45.42).
| RMFCX | STRAX | RMFCX / STRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.65 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.78 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.697 | -8.004 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92.2B | 34.8M | 264,943% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.90 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.43 | -1.08 | 409% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.65 | 17.53 | -4% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.42 | 91.22 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.29 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...