Ad is loading...
RMFCX vs STRAX
RMFCX vs STRAX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs STRAX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$54.99
Change-$0.12 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.86B
Sterling Capital Behav Lg Cp Val Eq R6
Price$30.91
Change-$0.02 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.71M
RMFCX vs STRAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. STRAX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and STRAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. STRAX (40.7M). STRAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: STRAX (1.95) vs RMFCX (1.37). RMFCX was incepted earlier than STRAX: RMFCX (23 years) vs STRAX (7 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than STRAX (0.78). STRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.98 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than STRAX: RMFCX (250) vs STRAX (10000000). STRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.44 vs. RMFCX (4.39). STRAX return over 5 years is better than : 113.51 vs. RMFCX (55.82).
| RMFCX | STRAX | RMFCX / STRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.65 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.78 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.050 | 2.917 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101B | 40.7M | 248,157% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.95 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.39 | 11.44 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.27 | 41.84 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.82 | 113.51 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.49 | N/A | - |