Ad is loading...
RMFCX vs STRAX
RMFCX vs STRAX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs STRAX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$56.33
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.52B
Sterling Capital Behav Lg Cp Val Eq R6
Price$31.51
Change-$0.23 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.34M
RMFCX vs STRAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. STRAX commentary
Jan 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and STRAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. STRAX (38.3M). RMFCX (1.69) and STRAX (1.66) have matching dividends . RMFCX was incepted earlier than STRAX: RMFCX (23 years) vs STRAX (7 years). STRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.98 vs. RMFCX (25.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than STRAX: RMFCX (250) vs STRAX (10000000). STRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.27 vs. RMFCX (12.29). STRAX return over 5 years is better than : 73.62 vs. RMFCX (40.36).
| RMFCX | STRAX | RMFCX / STRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.187 | 4.372 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 105B | 38.3M | 274,151% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 1.66 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.29 | 25.27 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.30 | 38.97 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.36 | 73.62 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.40 | N/A | - |