Ad is loading...
RMFCX vs SVIFX
RMFCX vs SVIFX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs SVIFX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.77
Change+$0.30 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.41B
Virtus Ceredex Large-Cap Value Equity C
Price$9.52
Change+$0.07 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets632.74M
RMFCX vs SVIFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. SVIFX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and SVIFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. SVIFX (633M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than SVIFX: RMFCX (1.69) vs SVIFX (0.56). RMFCX was incepted earlier than SVIFX: RMFCX (23 years) vs SVIFX (30 years). SVIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. RMFCX (25.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SVIFX: RMFCX (250) vs SVIFX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.43 vs. SVIFX (-4.10). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.82 vs. SVIFX (-27.63).
| RMFCX | SVIFX | RMFCX / SVIFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.162 | 5.193 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 103B | 633M | 16,272% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 0.56 | 300% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.43 | -4.10 | -304% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.60 | -18.52 | -68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.82 | -27.63 | -137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.18 | -37.27 | -175% |