Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TOWFX
RMFCX vs TOWFX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TOWFX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.10
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
Towpath Focus Institutional
Price$18.17
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets57.74M
RMFCX vs TOWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TOWFX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and TOWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. TOWFX (57.7M). RMFCX (1.20) and TOWFX (1.16) have matching dividends . RMFCX was incepted earlier than TOWFX: RMFCX (23 years) vs TOWFX (6 years). TOWFX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. TOWFX (4.07). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TOWFX: RMFCX (250) vs TOWFX (2000). TOWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.38 vs. RMFCX (8.11). TOWFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.50 vs. RMFCX (59.28).
| RMFCX | TOWFX | RMFCX / TOWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.97 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.97 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.779 | 15.870 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 113B | 57.7M | 195,841% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.16 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.11 | 19.38 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.61 | 60.48 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.28 | 93.50 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.90 | N/A | - |