Ad is loading...
RMFCX vs TRCPX
RMFCX vs TRCPX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TRCPX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$53.56
Change+$3.33 (+6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.19B
Nuveen Large Cap Value Premier
Price$20.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.82B
RMFCX vs TRCPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TRCPX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and TRCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 92.2B vs. TRCPX (5.82B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than TRCPX: RMFCX (1.34) vs TRCPX (1.27). RMFCX was incepted earlier than TRCPX: RMFCX (23 years) vs TRCPX (16 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than TRCPX (0.56). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. TRCPX (23.00). TRCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: TRCPX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.43 vs. TRCPX (-6.00). RMFCX (45.42) and TRCPX (44.68) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RMFCX | TRCPX | RMFCX / TRCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.56 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.56 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.697 | -8.753 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92.2B | 5.82B | 1,583% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.27 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.43 | -6.00 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.65 | -2.81 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.42 | 44.68 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.29 | 17.61 | 263% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers