Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TRCPX
RMFCX vs TRCPX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TRCPX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
Nuveen Large Cap Value Premier
Price$24.10
Change+$0.17 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.59B
RMFCX vs TRCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TRCPX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and TRCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. TRCPX (6.59B). RMFCX (1.27) and TRCPX (1.22) have matching dividends . RMFCX was incepted earlier than TRCPX: RMFCX (23 years) vs TRCPX (16 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than TRCPX (0.56). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. TRCPX (19.00). TRCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: TRCPX (0) vs RMFCX (250). TRCPX (12.03) and RMFCX (11.47) have marching annual gain over last year. TRCPX return over 5 years is better than : 66.09 vs. RMFCX (61.83).
| RMFCX | TRCPX | RMFCX / TRCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.56 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.56 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.596 | 9.297 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109B | 6.59B | 1,654% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.22 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | 12.03 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.27 | 32.53 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.83 | 66.09 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.21 | 44.62 | 178% |