Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFCX vs TRCPX
RMFCX vs TRCPX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs TRCPX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.44
Change-$0.13 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
Nuveen Large Cap Value Premier
Price$24.46
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.38B
RMFCX vs TRCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. TRCPX commentary
Aug 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Buy and TRCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. TRCPX (6.38B). RMFCX (1.26) and TRCPX (1.22) have matching dividends . RMFCX was incepted earlier than TRCPX: RMFCX (23 years) vs TRCPX (16 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than TRCPX (0.56). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. TRCPX (19.00). TRCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: TRCPX (0) vs RMFCX (250). TRCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.71 vs. RMFCX (6.57). TRCPX (54.38) and RMFCX (53.88) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RMFCX | TRCPX | RMFCX / TRCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.56 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.56 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.403 | 10.975 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109B | 6.38B | 1,708% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.22 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.57 | 7.71 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.34 | 30.25 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.88 | 54.38 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.02 | 60.57 | 159% |