Ad is loading...
RMFCX vs WLCAX
RMFCX vs WLCAX Comparison
Open Charts RMFCX vs WLCAX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.96
Change+$0.76 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
Allspring Large Company Value A
Price$12.82
Change+$0.20 (+1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets223.4M
RMFCX vs WLCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFCX vs. WLCAX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFCX is a Hold and WLCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. WLCAX (223M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than WLCAX: RMFCX (1.34) vs WLCAX (1.02). RMFCX was incepted earlier than WLCAX: RMFCX (23 years) vs WLCAX (17 years). WLCAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). WLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 237.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLCAX: RMFCX (250) vs WLCAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.87 vs. WLCAX (-9.06). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 53.32 vs. WLCAX (19.48).
| RMFCX | WLCAX | RMFCX / WLCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.82 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.96 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.681 | -4.167 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 95.8B | 223M | 42,960% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.02 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.87 | -9.06 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.27 | 1.27 | 493% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.32 | 19.48 | 274% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.78 | -15.46 | -354% |