Ad is loading...
RMFEX vs SFLNX
RMFEX vs SFLNX Comparison
Open Charts RMFEX vs SFLNX
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$55.46
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.91B
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Idx
Price$27.35
Change+$0.19 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.2B
RMFEX vs SFLNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFEX vs. SFLNX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFEX is a Buy and SFLNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. SFLNX (9.2B). SFLNX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: SFLNX (1.84) vs RMFEX (1.65). RMFEX was incepted earlier than SFLNX: RMFEX (23 years) vs SFLNX (18 years). RMFEX (0.62) is less costly to investors than SFLNX (0.25). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. SFLNX (8.00). SFLNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: SFLNX (0) vs RMFEX (250). SFLNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.47 vs. RMFEX (5.68). SFLNX return over 5 years is better than : 93.36 vs. RMFEX (58.56).
| RMFEX | SFLNX | RMFEX / SFLNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.25 | 248% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.25 | 248% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.374 | -2.513 | -55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101B | 9.2B | 1,097% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 1.84 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.68 | 6.47 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.38 | 31.81 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.56 | 93.36 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.50 | 90.36 | 74% |