Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFEX vs SFLNX
RMFEX vs SFLNX Comparison
Open Charts RMFEX vs SFLNX
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$58.02
Change+$0.32 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Idx
Price$28.36
Change+$0.31 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.49B
RMFEX vs SFLNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFEX vs. SFLNX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFEX is a Buy and SFLNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. SFLNX (9.49B). SFLNX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: SFLNX (1.78) vs RMFEX (1.58). RMFEX was incepted earlier than SFLNX: RMFEX (23 years) vs SFLNX (18 years). RMFEX (0.62) is less costly to investors than SFLNX (0.25). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. SFLNX (8.00). SFLNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: SFLNX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.37 vs. SFLNX (8.70). SFLNX return over 5 years is better than : 78.61 vs. RMFEX (54.01).
| RMFEX | SFLNX | RMFEX / SFLNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.25 | 248% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.25 | 248% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.053 | 0.682 | 888% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 105B | 9.49B | 1,106% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 1.78 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.37 | 8.70 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.90 | 29.81 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.01 | 78.61 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.06 | 99.16 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement