Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFEX vs TRLHX
RMFEX vs TRLHX Comparison
Open Charts RMFEX vs TRLHX
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$62.40
Change+$0.51 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
Nuveen Large Cap Value I
Price$24.93
Change+$0.25 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.17B
RMFEX vs TRLHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFEX vs. TRLHX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFEX is a Buy and TRLHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. TRLHX (6.17B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than TRLHX: RMFEX (1.46) vs TRLHX (1.21). RMFEX was incepted earlier than TRLHX: RMFEX (23 years) vs TRLHX (10 years). RMFEX (0.62) is less costly to investors than TRLHX (0.50). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. TRLHX (19.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRLHX: RMFEX (250) vs TRLHX (100000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.87 vs. TRLHX (4.91). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 63.57 vs. TRLHX (56.77).
| RMFEX | TRLHX | RMFEX / TRLHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.50 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.50 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.880 | 11.877 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111B | 6.17B | 1,800% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 1.21 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.87 | 4.91 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.73 | 34.32 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.57 | 56.77 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.37 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement