RMGGF
Price
$0.45
Change
-$0.05 (-10.00%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
906.05M
RMRDF
Price
$0.45
Change
+$0.03 (+7.14%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
155.06M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMGGF vs RMRDF

Header iconRMGGF vs RMRDF Comparison
Open Charts RMGGF vs RMRDFBanner chart's image
Resolute Mining
Price$0.45
Change-$0.05 (-10.00%)
Volume$11K
Capitalization906.05M
Radisson Mining Resources
Price$0.45
Change+$0.03 (+7.14%)
Volume$455.99K
Capitalization155.06M
RMGGF vs RMRDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RMGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMGGF vs. RMRDF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMGGF is a StrongBuy and RMRDF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (RMGGF: $0.45 vs. RMRDF: $0.45)
Brand notoriety: RMGGF and RMRDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMGGF: 82% vs. RMRDF: 146%
Market capitalization -- RMGGF: $906.05M vs. RMRDF: $155.06M
RMGGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $906.05M. RMRDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $155.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMGGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMRDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RMGGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RMRDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMRDF is a better buy in the long-term than RMGGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RMGGF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMRDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RMGGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RMRDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMGGF is a better buy in the short-term than RMRDF.

Price Growth

RMGGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -10.35% price change this week, while RMRDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +22.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3316.97%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.27% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMGGF($906M) has a higher market cap than RMRDF($155M). RMGGF YTD gains are higher at: 103.517 vs. RMRDF (89.235). RMGGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 80.2M vs. RMRDF (-2.03M). RMGGF has more cash in the bank: 101M vs. RMRDF (5.86M). RMGGF has higher revenues than RMRDF: RMGGF (643M) vs RMRDF (0).
RMGGFRMRDFRMGGF / RMRDF
Capitalization906M155M585%
EBITDA80.2M-2.03M-3,956%
Gain YTD103.51789.235116%
P/E Ratio77.13N/A-
Revenue643M0-
Total Cash101M5.86M1,724%
Total Debt58.7MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMGGF vs RMRDF: Fundamental Ratings
RMGGF
RMRDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3226
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10053
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4035
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMGGF's Valuation (86) in the null industry is in the same range as RMRDF (95). This means that RMGGF’s stock grew similarly to RMRDF’s over the last 12 months.

RMRDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMGGF (100). This means that RMRDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

RMRDF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RMGGF (100). This means that RMRDF’s stock grew similarly to RMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

RMRDF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as RMGGF (40). This means that RMRDF’s stock grew similarly to RMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

RMRDF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RMGGF (100). This means that RMRDF’s stock grew similarly to RMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMGGFRMRDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RMGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSGVX140.780.45
+0.32%
State Street Glb All Cap Eq ex-US Idx
TGDVX16.98N/A
N/A
TCW Relative Value Large Cap N
VMSGX22.99N/A
N/A
VALIC Company I Mid Cap Strategic Gr
ACWEX16.51N/A
N/A
Cavanal Hill World Energy C
SVFYX82.84N/A
N/A
Smead Value Y

RMGGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMGGF and SROYF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMGGF and SROYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMGGF
1D Price
Change %
RMGGF100%
N/A
SROYF - RMGGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.02%
RMETF - RMGGF
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.00%
RMRDF - RMGGF
2%
Poorly correlated
+7.04%
RMLFF - RMGGF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
RVLGF - RMGGF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+11.42%
More

RMRDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMRDF and NSUPF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMRDF and NSUPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMRDF
1D Price
Change %
RMRDF100%
+7.04%
NSUPF - RMRDF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
DCHRF - RMRDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IAUX - RMRDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
PAAS - RMRDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
CGLCF - RMRDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.30%
More