RMGGF
Price
$0.45
Change
-$0.05 (-10.00%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
906.05M
RVLGF
Price
$0.52
Change
+$0.06 (+13.04%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
105.85M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMGGF vs RVLGF

Header iconRMGGF vs RVLGF Comparison
Open Charts RMGGF vs RVLGFBanner chart's image
Resolute Mining
Price$0.45
Change-$0.05 (-10.00%)
Volume$11K
Capitalization906.05M
Revival Gold
Price$0.52
Change+$0.06 (+13.04%)
Volume$592.09K
Capitalization105.85M
RMGGF vs RVLGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RMGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RVLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMGGF vs. RVLGF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMGGF is a StrongBuy and RVLGF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (RMGGF: $0.45 vs. RVLGF: $0.52)
Brand notoriety: RMGGF and RVLGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMGGF: 82% vs. RVLGF: 277%
Market capitalization -- RMGGF: $906.05M vs. RVLGF: $105.85M
RMGGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $906.05M. RVLGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $105.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMGGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRVLGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RMGGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RVLGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RVLGF is a better buy in the long-term than RMGGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RMGGF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RVLGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RMGGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RVLGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMGGF is a better buy in the short-term than RVLGF.

Price Growth

RMGGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -10.35% price change this week, while RVLGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +38.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3316.97%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.27% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMGGF($906M) has a higher market cap than RVLGF($106M). RVLGF YTD gains are higher at: 157.313 vs. RMGGF (103.517). RMGGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 80.2M vs. RVLGF (-9.33M). RMGGF has more cash in the bank: 101M vs. RVLGF (3.05M). RMGGF has higher revenues than RVLGF: RMGGF (643M) vs RVLGF (0).
RMGGFRVLGFRMGGF / RVLGF
Capitalization906M106M855%
EBITDA80.2M-9.33M-860%
Gain YTD103.517157.31366%
P/E Ratio77.13N/A-
Revenue643M0-
Total Cash101M3.05M3,313%
Total Debt58.7MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMGGF vs RVLGF: Fundamental Ratings
RMGGF
RVLGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3220
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4036
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RVLGF's Valuation (64) in the null industry is in the same range as RMGGF (86). This means that RVLGF’s stock grew similarly to RMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

RVLGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RMGGF (100). This means that RVLGF’s stock grew similarly to RMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

RVLGF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RMGGF (100). This means that RVLGF’s stock grew similarly to RMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

RVLGF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as RMGGF (40). This means that RVLGF’s stock grew similarly to RMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

RVLGF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RMGGF (100). This means that RVLGF’s stock grew similarly to RMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMGGFRVLGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RMGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RVLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TOELY71.122.27
+3.30%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
AUGG1.210.01
+0.62%
Augusta Gold Corp.
OXINF25.55N/A
N/A
Oxford Instruments plc
IBIDF43.00N/A
N/A
Ibiden Co. Ltd.
CANOF0.25N/A
-1.72%
California Nanotechnologies Corp

RMGGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMGGF and SROYF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMGGF and SROYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMGGF
1D Price
Change %
RMGGF100%
N/A
SROYF - RMGGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.02%
RMETF - RMGGF
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.00%
RMRDF - RMGGF
2%
Poorly correlated
+7.04%
RMLFF - RMGGF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
RVLGF - RMGGF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+11.42%
More

RVLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RVLGF and WPM have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RVLGF and WPM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RVLGF
1D Price
Change %
RVLGF100%
+11.42%
WPM - RVLGF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
SA - RVLGF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
TORXF - RVLGF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
AGI - RVLGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
RGLD - RVLGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
More