RMGOF
Price
$7.97
Change
-$1.31 (-14.12%)
Updated
Nov 22 closing price
Capitalization
5.72B
SOLCF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
8.3M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMGOF vs SOLCF

Header iconRMGOF vs SOLCF Comparison
Open Charts RMGOF vs SOLCFBanner chart's image
Remgro
Price$7.97
Change-$1.31 (-14.12%)
Volume$4.23K
Capitalization5.72B
SOL Global Investments
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$18.75K
Capitalization8.3M
RMGOF vs SOLCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RMGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SOLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMGOF vs. SOLCF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMGOF is a Hold and SOLCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (RMGOF: $7.97 vs. SOLCF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: RMGOF and SOLCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMGOF: 100% vs. SOLCF: 10%
Market capitalization -- RMGOF: $5.72B vs. SOLCF: $8.3M
RMGOF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $5.72B. SOLCF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $8.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $177.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMGOF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSOLCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RMGOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SOLCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMGOF is a better buy in the long-term than SOLCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RMGOF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SOLCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RMGOF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SOLCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMGOF is a better buy in the short-term than SOLCF.

Price Growth

RMGOF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SOLCF (@Investment Managers) price change was -13.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.35%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.99% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMGOF($5.72B) has a higher market cap than SOLCF($8.3M). RMGOF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. SOLCF (-84.227). RMGOF has higher revenues than SOLCF: RMGOF (53B) vs SOLCF (-26.22M).
RMGOFSOLCFRMGOF / SOLCF
Capitalization5.72B8.3M68,985%
EBITDA4.32BN/A-
Gain YTD0.000-84.227-
P/E Ratio104.82N/A-
Revenue53B-26.22M-202,134%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A4.6M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMGOF vs SOLCF: Fundamental Ratings
RMGOF
SOLCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5051
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
29100
SMR RATING
1..100
97100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5993
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5992
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMGOF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SOLCF (74). This means that RMGOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SOLCF’s over the last 12 months.

RMGOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SOLCF (100). This means that RMGOF’s stock grew significantly faster than SOLCF’s over the last 12 months.

RMGOF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as SOLCF (100). This means that RMGOF’s stock grew similarly to SOLCF’s over the last 12 months.

RMGOF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SOLCF (93). This means that RMGOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SOLCF’s over the last 12 months.

RMGOF's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SOLCF (92). This means that RMGOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SOLCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMGOFSOLCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
14%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RMGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SOLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PEAPX33.88N/A
N/A
Principal Glb Emerging Markets R3
HWMIX58.05N/A
N/A
Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value I
KNPAX119.24N/A
N/A
Kinetics Paradigm Adv A
TSAMX14.67N/A
N/A
Thornburg Summit A
BALFX38.37-0.16
-0.42%
American Funds American Balanced F1

RMGOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMGOF and RAFI have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMGOF and RAFI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMGOF
1D Price
Change %
RMGOF100%
N/A
RAFI - RMGOF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
SOLCF - RMGOF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.96%
SFFFF - RMGOF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RESCU - RMGOF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STJPF - RMGOF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SOLCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SOLCF and JBARF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SOLCF and JBARF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOLCF
1D Price
Change %
SOLCF100%
-1.96%
JBARF - SOLCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QUILF - SOLCF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RMGOF - SOLCF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RESCU - SOLCF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STJPF - SOLCF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More