RMLFF
Price
$0.96
Change
+$0.05 (+5.49%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
583.5M
RMLRF
Price
$2.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
3.84B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMLFF vs RMLRF

Header iconRMLFF vs RMLRF Comparison
Open Charts RMLFF vs RMLRFBanner chart's image
Rusoro Mining
Price$0.96
Change+$0.05 (+5.49%)
Volume$185.41K
Capitalization583.5M
Ramelius Resources
Price$2.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$41.48K
Capitalization3.84B
RMLFF vs RMLRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RMLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMLFF vs. RMLRF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMLFF is a Buy and RMLRF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (RMLFF: $0.96 vs. RMLRF: $2.05)
Brand notoriety: RMLFF and RMLRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMLFF: 80% vs. RMLRF: 228%
Market capitalization -- RMLFF: $583.5M vs. RMLRF: $3.84B
RMLFF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $583.5M. RMLRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMLFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMLRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RMLFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RMLRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMLFF is a better buy in the long-term than RMLRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RMLFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMLRF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RMLFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RMLRF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMLRF is a better buy in the short-term than RMLFF.

Price Growth

RMLFF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +7.18% price change this week, while RMLRF (@Precious Metals) price change was +7.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3316.97%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.27% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLRF($3.84B) has a higher market cap than RMLFF($583M). RMLFF YTD gains are higher at: 66.957 vs. RMLRF (62.302). RMLRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 635M vs. RMLFF (-51.83M). RMLRF has higher revenues than RMLFF: RMLRF (1.04B) vs RMLFF (0).
RMLFFRMLRFRMLFF / RMLRF
Capitalization583M3.84B15%
EBITDA-51.83M635M-8%
Gain YTD66.95762.302107%
P/E RatioN/A7.74-
Revenue01.04B-
Total Cash496KN/A-
Total Debt82.1MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMLFF vs RMLRF: Fundamental Ratings
RMLFF
RMLRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2919
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3373
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3742
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
90100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMLRF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as RMLFF (40). This means that RMLRF’s stock grew similarly to RMLFF’s over the last 12 months.

RMLFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMLRF (73). This means that RMLFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMLRF’s over the last 12 months.

RMLFF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RMLRF (100). This means that RMLFF’s stock grew similarly to RMLRF’s over the last 12 months.

RMLFF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as RMLRF (42). This means that RMLFF’s stock grew similarly to RMLRF’s over the last 12 months.

RMLFF's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as RMLRF (100). This means that RMLFF’s stock grew similarly to RMLRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMLFFRMLRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RMLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JAAGX82.400.09
+0.11%
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Instl
GSTSX11.14N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth Svc
FASGX30.51N/A
N/A
Fidelity Asset Manager 70%
DRDAX26.43N/A
N/A
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend A
GSPFX19.43N/A
N/A
Gotham Enhanced S&P 500 Index Instl

RMLFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMLFF and AUGO have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMLFF and AUGO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMLFF
1D Price
Change %
RMLFF100%
+5.49%
AUGO - RMLFF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
GDRZF - RMLFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.95%
GRCAF - RMLFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.28%
RMRDF - RMLFF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
RMLRF - RMLFF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.99%
More