RMLFF
Price
$0.76
Change
-$0.01 (-1.30%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
185.38M
RMLRF
Price
$1.60
Change
-$0.16 (-9.09%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
858.29M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMLFF vs RMLRF

Header iconRMLFF vs RMLRF Comparison
Open Charts RMLFF vs RMLRFBanner chart's image
Rusoro Mining
Price$0.76
Change-$0.01 (-1.30%)
Volume$599.36K
Capitalization185.38M
Ramelius Resources
Price$1.60
Change-$0.16 (-9.09%)
Volume$6.73K
Capitalization858.29M
RMLFF vs RMLRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMLFF vs. RMLRF commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMLFF is a Hold and RMLRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (RMLFF: $0.76 vs. RMLRF: $1.60)
Brand notoriety: RMLFF and RMLRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMLFF: 630% vs. RMLRF: 299%
Market capitalization -- RMLFF: $185.38M vs. RMLRF: $858.29M
RMLFF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $185.38M. RMLRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $858.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMLFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMLRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RMLFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RMLRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both RMLFF and RMLRF are a good buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

RMLFF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +13.43% price change this week, while RMLRF (@Precious Metals) price change was -9.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.88%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.62% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLRF($858M) has a higher market cap than RMLFF($185M). RMLFF YTD gains are higher at: 32.174 vs. RMLRF (26.984). RMLRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 249M vs. RMLFF (-6.06M). RMLRF has more cash in the bank: 169M vs. RMLFF (246). RMLFF has less debt than RMLRF: RMLFF (35.3M) vs RMLRF (54M). RMLRF has higher revenues than RMLFF: RMLRF (598M) vs RMLFF (0).
RMLFFRMLRFRMLFF / RMLRF
Capitalization185M858M22%
EBITDA-6.06M249M-2%
Gain YTD32.17426.984119%
P/E RatioN/A57.47-
Revenue0598M-
Total Cash246169M0%
Total Debt35.3M54M65%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMLFF vs RMLRF: Fundamental Ratings
RMLFF
RMLRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8587
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3972
SMR RATING
1..100
10034
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3648
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9098
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMLRF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as RMLFF (35). This means that RMLRF’s stock grew similarly to RMLFF’s over the last 12 months.

RMLFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMLRF (72). This means that RMLFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMLRF’s over the last 12 months.

RMLRF's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RMLFF (100). This means that RMLRF’s stock grew significantly faster than RMLFF’s over the last 12 months.

RMLFF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as RMLRF (48). This means that RMLFF’s stock grew similarly to RMLRF’s over the last 12 months.

RMLFF's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as RMLRF (98). This means that RMLFF’s stock grew similarly to RMLRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AGMH2.420.20
+9.01%
AGM Group Holdings Inc
ET18.180.51
+2.89%
Energy Transfer LP
FISI25.810.65
+2.58%
Financial Institutions
FG32.280.73
+2.31%
F&G Annuities & Life
ICHR19.220.40
+2.13%
Ichor Holdings

RMLFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMLFF and ORAAF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMLFF and ORAAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMLFF
1D Price
Change %
RMLFF100%
-0.85%
ORAAF - RMLFF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GDRZF - RMLFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.49%
BADEF - RMLFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
GRCAF - RMLFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-14.75%
RKHNF - RMLFF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RMLRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMLRF and GLBKF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMLRF and GLBKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMLRF
1D Price
Change %
RMLRF100%
N/A
GLBKF - RMLRF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MXROF - RMLRF
21%
Poorly correlated
-29.73%
DDEJF - RMLRF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RMRDF - RMLRF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.37%
RMLFF - RMLRF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
More