Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMLPX vs SMAPX
RMLPX vs SMAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMLPX vs. SMAPX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMLPX is a Hold and SMAPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMAPX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. RMLPX (1.15B). RMLPX pays higher dividends than SMAPX: RMLPX (5.15) vs SMAPX (4.09). RMLPX was incepted earlier than SMAPX: RMLPX (8 years) vs SMAPX (13 years). SMAPX (1.40) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). SMAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RMLPX (15.00). SMAPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMLPX: SMAPX (1000) vs RMLPX (2500). SMAPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.20 vs. RMLPX (10.20). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 219.55 vs. SMAPX (150.20).
| RMLPX | SMAPX | RMLPX / SMAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.37 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.40 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.793 | 3.351 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 1.28B | 90% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.15 | 4.09 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.20 | 20.20 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.07 | 64.35 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 219.55 | 150.20 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 60.43 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement