Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMLPX vs SMAPX
RMLPX vs SMAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMLPX vs. SMAPX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMLPX is a Hold and SMAPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMAPX has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. RMLPX (1.17B). RMLPX pays higher dividends than SMAPX: RMLPX (5.20) vs SMAPX (4.08). RMLPX was incepted earlier than SMAPX: RMLPX (8 years) vs SMAPX (13 years). SMAPX (1.40) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). SMAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RMLPX (15.00). SMAPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMLPX: SMAPX (1000) vs RMLPX (2500). SMAPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.71 vs. RMLPX (9.61). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 237.15 vs. SMAPX (160.02).
| RMLPX | SMAPX | RMLPX / SMAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.37 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.40 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.369 | 2.561 | 210% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.17B | 1.26B | 92% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.20 | 4.08 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.61 | 16.71 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.05 | 78.90 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 237.15 | 160.02 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 41.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement