Ad is loading...
RMLPX vs SMAPX
RMLPX vs SMAPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMLPX vs. SMAPX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMLPX is a StrongBuy and SMAPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMAPX has more cash in the bank: 1.35B vs. RMLPX (1.17B). RMLPX pays higher dividends than SMAPX: RMLPX (5.08) vs SMAPX (4.02). RMLPX was incepted earlier than SMAPX: RMLPX (7 years) vs SMAPX (12 years). SMAPX (1.40) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). SMAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RMLPX (15.00). SMAPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMLPX: SMAPX (1000) vs RMLPX (2500). SMAPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.86 vs. RMLPX (15.83). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 381.77 vs. SMAPX (259.70).
| RMLPX | SMAPX | RMLPX / SMAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.40 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.40 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.803 | 8.050 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.17B | 1.35B | 87% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.08 | 4.02 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.83 | 31.86 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.10 | 62.92 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 381.77 | 259.70 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 39.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...