RMLRF
Price
$2.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
3.84B
RMRDF
Price
$0.45
Change
+$0.03 (+7.14%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
155.06M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMLRF vs RMRDF

Header iconRMLRF vs RMRDF Comparison
Open Charts RMLRF vs RMRDFBanner chart's image
Ramelius Resources
Price$2.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$41.48K
Capitalization3.84B
Radisson Mining Resources
Price$0.45
Change+$0.03 (+7.14%)
Volume$455.99K
Capitalization155.06M
RMLRF vs RMRDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RMLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMLRF vs. RMRDF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMLRF is a Buy and RMRDF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (RMLRF: $2.05 vs. RMRDF: $0.45)
Brand notoriety: RMLRF and RMRDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMLRF: 228% vs. RMRDF: 146%
Market capitalization -- RMLRF: $3.84B vs. RMRDF: $155.06M
RMLRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.84B. RMRDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $155.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMLRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRMRDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RMLRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RMRDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMLRF is a better buy in the long-term than RMRDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RMLRF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMRDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RMLRF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RMRDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMLRF is a better buy in the short-term than RMRDF.

Price Growth

RMLRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +7.07% price change this week, while RMRDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +22.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3358.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.86% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLRF($3.84B) has a higher market cap than RMRDF($155M). RMRDF YTD gains are higher at: 89.235 vs. RMLRF (62.302). RMLRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 635M vs. RMRDF (-2.03M). RMLRF has higher revenues than RMRDF: RMLRF (1.04B) vs RMRDF (0).
RMLRFRMRDFRMLRF / RMRDF
Capitalization3.84B155M2,477%
EBITDA635M-2.03M-31,326%
Gain YTD62.30289.23570%
P/E Ratio7.74N/A-
Revenue1.04B0-
Total CashN/A5.86M-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMLRF vs RMRDF: Fundamental Ratings
RMLRF
RMRDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1926
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7353
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4235
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMLRF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RMRDF (95). This means that RMLRF’s stock grew significantly faster than RMRDF’s over the last 12 months.

RMRDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as RMLRF (73). This means that RMRDF’s stock grew similarly to RMLRF’s over the last 12 months.

RMRDF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RMLRF (100). This means that RMRDF’s stock grew similarly to RMLRF’s over the last 12 months.

RMRDF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as RMLRF (42). This means that RMRDF’s stock grew similarly to RMLRF’s over the last 12 months.

RMRDF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RMLRF (100). This means that RMRDF’s stock grew similarly to RMLRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMLRFRMRDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RMLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PLVIX20.44N/A
N/A
Principal Large Cap Value III Inst
RMDAX5.41N/A
N/A
Virtus Silvant Mid-Cap Growth A
HLIDX14.85N/A
N/A
Harding Loevner Intl Dev Mkts Eq Inst
HIBSX92.01N/A
N/A
Hartford Stock HLS IB
MEIIX53.19N/A
N/A
MFS Value I

RMLRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMLRF and GLBKF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMLRF and GLBKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMLRF
1D Price
Change %
RMLRF100%
-0.24%
GLBKF - RMLRF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RMRDF - RMLRF
4%
Poorly correlated
+7.04%
RMLFF - RMLRF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
RUPRF - RMLRF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
RMGGF - RMLRF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More