RMLRF
Price
$1.60
Change
-$0.16 (-9.09%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
858.29M
RMRDF
Price
$0.28
Change
+$0.01 (+3.70%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
46.12M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMLRF vs RMRDF

Header iconRMLRF vs RMRDF Comparison
Open Charts RMLRF vs RMRDFBanner chart's image
Ramelius Resources
Price$1.60
Change-$0.16 (-9.09%)
Volume$6.73K
Capitalization858.29M
Radisson Mining Resources
Price$0.28
Change+$0.01 (+3.70%)
Volume$201.45K
Capitalization46.12M
RMLRF vs RMRDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RMRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMLRF vs. RMRDF commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMLRF is a Hold and RMRDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (RMLRF: $1.60 vs. RMRDF: $0.28)
Brand notoriety: RMLRF and RMRDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMLRF: 299% vs. RMRDF: 95%
Market capitalization -- RMLRF: $858.29M vs. RMRDF: $46.12M
RMLRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $858.29M. RMRDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $46.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMLRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRMRDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RMLRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RMRDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMLRF is a better buy in the long-term than RMRDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RMRDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RMRDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

RMLRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -9.09% price change this week, while RMRDF (@Precious Metals) price change was -8.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.88%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.62% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLRF($858M) has a higher market cap than RMRDF($46.1M). RMLRF YTD gains are higher at: 26.984 vs. RMRDF (17.325). RMLRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 249M vs. RMRDF (-2.3M). RMLRF has more cash in the bank: 169M vs. RMRDF (1.8M). RMLRF has higher revenues than RMRDF: RMLRF (598M) vs RMRDF (0).
RMLRFRMRDFRMLRF / RMRDF
Capitalization858M46.1M1,861%
EBITDA249M-2.3M-10,813%
Gain YTD26.98417.325156%
P/E Ratio57.47N/A-
Revenue598M0-
Total Cash169M1.8M9,373%
Total Debt54MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMLRF vs RMRDF: Fundamental Ratings
RMLRF
RMRDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8780
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7267
SMR RATING
1..100
3491
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4838
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9889
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMLRF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RMRDF (94). This means that RMLRF’s stock grew significantly faster than RMRDF’s over the last 12 months.

RMRDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is in the same range as RMLRF (72). This means that RMRDF’s stock grew similarly to RMLRF’s over the last 12 months.

RMLRF's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMRDF (91). This means that RMLRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMRDF’s over the last 12 months.

RMRDF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as RMLRF (48). This means that RMRDF’s stock grew similarly to RMLRF’s over the last 12 months.

RMRDF's P/E Growth Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as RMLRF (98). This means that RMRDF’s stock grew similarly to RMLRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMRDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RMRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASXFY45.781.04
+2.34%
ASX, Ltd.
CMPGY34.120.28
+0.84%
Compass Group Plc
NLST0.66N/A
+0.35%
Netlist, Inc.
NPSCY6.23-0.04
-0.64%
Nippon Steel Corporation
AKEMF0.06N/A
-2.34%
ALASKA ENERGY METALS CORP.

RMLRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMLRF and GLBKF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMLRF and GLBKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMLRF
1D Price
Change %
RMLRF100%
N/A
GLBKF - RMLRF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MXROF - RMLRF
21%
Poorly correlated
-29.73%
DDEJF - RMLRF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RMRDF - RMLRF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.37%
RMLFF - RMLRF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
More

RMRDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMRDF and NSUPF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMRDF and NSUPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMRDF
1D Price
Change %
RMRDF100%
+2.37%
NSUPF - RMRDF
29%
Poorly correlated
+4.83%
DCHRF - RMRDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IAUX - RMRDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
PAAS - RMRDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.57%
CGLCF - RMRDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
More