Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMQCX vs UGPIX
RMQCX vs UGPIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMQCX vs. UGPIX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMQCX is a Buy and UGPIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQCX has more cash in the bank: 962M vs. UGPIX (26.4M). UGPIX pays higher dividends than RMQCX: UGPIX (2.27) vs RMQCX (0.24). RMQCX was incepted earlier than UGPIX: RMQCX (11 years) vs UGPIX (18 years). RMQCX (2.71) is less costly to investors than UGPIX (1.80). RMQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1036.00 vs. UGPIX (159.00). RMQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than UGPIX: RMQCX (2500) vs UGPIX (15000). UGPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.63 vs. RMQCX (8.32). RMQCX return over 5 years is better than : 108.33 vs. UGPIX (-84.40).
| RMQCX | UGPIX | RMQCX / UGPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.80 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.71 | 1.80 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.514 | 31.177 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 15000 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 962M | 26.4M | 3,644% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 2.27 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.32 | 31.63 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.49 | -22.32 | -334% |
| Returns for 5 years | 108.33 | -84.40 | -128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 895.09 | -74.32 | -1,204% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement