Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMQCX vs UGPIX
RMQCX vs UGPIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMQCX vs. UGPIX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMQCX is a Buy and UGPIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQCX has more cash in the bank: 948M vs. UGPIX (29.3M). UGPIX pays higher dividends than RMQCX: UGPIX (1.99) vs RMQCX (0.24). RMQCX was incepted earlier than UGPIX: RMQCX (11 years) vs UGPIX (18 years). RMQCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than UGPIX (1.80). RMQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1036.00 vs. UGPIX (159.00). RMQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than UGPIX: RMQCX (2500) vs UGPIX (15000). UGPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 74.51 vs. RMQCX (13.37). RMQCX return over 5 years is better than : 91.11 vs. UGPIX (-83.84).
| RMQCX | UGPIX | RMQCX / UGPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 1.80 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 1.80 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.401 | 50.076 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 15000 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 948M | 29.3M | 3,235% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 1.99 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.37 | 74.51 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 121.43 | -5.22 | -2,328% |
| Returns for 5 years | 91.11 | -83.84 | -109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 995.43 | -62.87 | -1,583% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement