Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMQCX vs UGPSX
RMQCX vs UGPSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMQCX vs. UGPSX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMQCX is a Buy and UGPSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQCX has more cash in the bank: 971M vs. UGPSX (29.2M). UGPSX pays higher dividends than RMQCX: UGPSX (1.54) vs RMQCX (0.24). RMQCX was incepted earlier than UGPSX: RMQCX (11 years) vs UGPSX (18 years). UGPSX (2.80) is less costly to investors than RMQCX (2.56). RMQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1036.00 vs. UGPSX (159.00). RMQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than UGPSX: RMQCX (2500) vs UGPSX (15000). UGPSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 71.12 vs. RMQCX (7.53). RMQCX return over 5 years is better than : 77.63 vs. UGPSX (-86.69).
| RMQCX | UGPSX | RMQCX / UGPSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 2.80 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 2.80 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.653 | 37.552 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 15000 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 971M | 29.2M | 3,325% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 1.54 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.53 | 71.12 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 103.18 | -26.27 | -393% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.63 | -86.69 | -90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1005.91 | -70.54 | -1,426% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement