Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMQHX vs UGPSX
RMQHX vs UGPSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMQHX vs. UGPSX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMQHX is a Buy and UGPSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQHX has more cash in the bank: 971M vs. UGPSX (29.2M). UGPSX pays higher dividends than RMQHX: UGPSX (1.54) vs RMQHX (0.21). RMQHX was incepted earlier than UGPSX: RMQHX (11 years) vs UGPSX (18 years). UGPSX (2.80) is less costly to investors than RMQHX (1.80). RMQHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1036.00 vs. UGPSX (159.00). RMQHX has a lower initial minimum investment than UGPSX: RMQHX (2500) vs UGPSX (15000). UGPSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 71.12 vs. RMQHX (11.37). RMQHX return over 5 years is better than : 91.33 vs. UGPSX (-86.69).
| RMQHX | UGPSX | RMQHX / UGPSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 2.80 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 2.80 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.223 | 37.552 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 15000 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 971M | 29.2M | 3,325% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 1.54 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.37 | 71.12 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 114.39 | -26.27 | -435% |
| Returns for 5 years | 91.33 | -86.69 | -105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1142.49 | -70.54 | -1,620% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement