Ad is loading...
RMQHX vs UGPSX
RMQHX vs UGPSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMQHX vs. UGPSX commentary
May 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMQHX is a Buy and UGPSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQHX has more cash in the bank: 517M vs. UGPSX (20.4M). UGPSX pays higher dividends than RMQHX: UGPSX (1.39) vs RMQHX (0.28). RMQHX was incepted earlier than UGPSX: RMQHX (10 years) vs UGPSX (17 years). UGPSX (2.80) is less costly to investors than RMQHX (1.95). RMQHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 334.00 vs. UGPSX (159.00). RMQHX has a lower initial minimum investment than UGPSX: RMQHX (2500) vs UGPSX (15000). UGPSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.28 vs. RMQHX (-5.60). RMQHX return over 5 years is better than : 151.29 vs. UGPSX (-78.58).
| RMQHX | UGPSX | RMQHX / UGPSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 2.80 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 2.80 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.822 | 14.832 | -107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 15000 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 517M | 20.4M | 2,534% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 1.39 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.60 | 7.28 | -77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.54 | -34.49 | -112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 151.29 | -78.58 | -193% |
| Returns for 10 years | 712.02 | -86.49 | -823% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...