Advertisement
RNSHF vs SEPJF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNSHF is a Hold and SEPJF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RNSHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSEPJF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- RNSHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SEPJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RNSHF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEPJF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RNSHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SEPJF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
RNSHF (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а -6.47% price change this week, while SEPJF (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was +4.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was +1.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.54%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (+1.82% weekly)This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.
| RNSHF | SEPJF | RNSHF / SEPJF | |
| Capitalization | 3.1B | 5.44B | 57% |
| EBITDA | 157M | 181M | 87% |
| Gain YTD | 0.631 | 80.878 | 1% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.58 | 71.36 | 33% |
| Revenue | 702M | 1.35B | 52% |
| Total Cash | 233M | 87.4M | 267% |
| Total Debt | 17.5M | 710M | 2% |
RNSHF | SEPJF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 96 | 27 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 56 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 61 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 10 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RNSHF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as SEPJF (17). This means that RNSHF’s stock grew similarly to SEPJF’s over the last 12 months.
SEPJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RNSHF (100). This means that SEPJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RNSHF’s over the last 12 months.
RNSHF's SMR Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as SEPJF (91). This means that RNSHF’s stock grew similarly to SEPJF’s over the last 12 months.
SEPJF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as RNSHF (44). This means that SEPJF’s stock grew similarly to RNSHF’s over the last 12 months.
SEPJF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RNSHF (61). This means that SEPJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RNSHF’s over the last 12 months.
| RNSHF | SEPJF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 30% | 1 day ago 48% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 35% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 30% | 1 day ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 28% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 30% | 1 day ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 22% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 20 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 69% |
Advertisement
RNSHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RNSHF and LCTC have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RNSHF and LCTC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RNSHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RNSHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| LCTC - RNSHF | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.26% | ||
| QURT - RNSHF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SCND - RNSHF | 6% Poorly correlated | -9.09% | ||
| SEPJF - RNSHF | 4% Poorly correlated | +4.52% | ||
| SIGL - RNSHF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SEPJF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SEPJF and HXGBY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SEPJF and HXGBY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEPJF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEPJF | 100% | +4.52% | ||
| HXGBY - SEPJF | 25% Poorly correlated | +8.51% | ||
| HXGBF - SEPJF | 21% Poorly correlated | +7.72% | ||
| ITRI - SEPJF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.55% | ||
| NXTBF - SEPJF | 18% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| QURT - SEPJF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||