Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNTTX vs VFWPX
RNTTX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RNTTX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv International Devd Mkts M
Price$51.32
Change+$0.43 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$151.98
Change+$1.46 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.16B
RNTTX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNTTX vs. VFWPX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNTTX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 74.2B vs. RNTTX (1.11B). RNTTX pays higher dividends than VFWPX: RNTTX (2.89) vs VFWPX (2.74). RNTTX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RNTTX (9 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RNTTX (1.03) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RNTTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RNTTX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RNTTX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.16 vs. RNTTX (15.64). RNTTX return over 5 years is better than : 59.67 vs. VFWPX (45.05).
| RNTTX | VFWPX | RNTTX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.03 | 2,900% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.03 | 3,433% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.790 | 26.221 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 74.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.89 | 2.74 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.64 | 17.16 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.59 | 62.66 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.67 | 45.05 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 67.32 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement